Infernal Banquet: Russian Blogger´s Obituary about Europe. Russian Foreign Minister: “Europe Committing Suicide”

Take a close look at the painting below – the Infernal Banquet. I found it in Club Orlov 26 June 2018  – but do not know the painter or the history behind it. I bring this obituary of Europe while I can still link without being stopped somehow by EU´s coming censoring “copyright legislation”.

I do think it tells a story on Europes future: – i.e. the fulfillment of Adam Weishaupt´and Mayer Amschel Rothschild´s Illuminati 6-point program from 1776 to destroy the old world order in favour of the  NWO Communism/Technocracy.  Starting with extinction of the white race
or “whiteness
as the Jewish Pharisees/Zionists say It is their revenge.  

Russian Club Orlov 26 June 2018: Around the world, very few people are capable of wrapping their heads around the European reaction to the migrant crisis (UN´s Replacement migration). On the side of the migrants, we have avid displays of barbarism, fanaticism and aggression; on the side of the Europeans, we have abject fear of appearing… intolerant.

Most people around the world see in this an orchidaceous display of anthropological nullity. “Is Europe dead?” they wonder aloud.

Russia’s FM Sergei Lavrov said that the European Union is “committing suicide” by letting in the invading hordes from the Middle East and North Africa.
Here we have a flood of people coming in, the majority of them young adult males shirking military service back home, and relatively few of them are qualified to seek asylum. Most of them are unqualified to do any sort of work within the EU due to lack of literacy, education or work ethic. Many of them would not be trainable in any case, coming as they are from populations bred for physical stamina and disease tolerance rather than intelligence and here.

Having spent the last several decades resurrecting Eastern Christendom after the damage caused to it by the Bolshevik barbarians, they European Russians) watch with dismay as the relics and ruins of Western Christendom are becoming submerged by a new barbarian wave.
Western Europe’s inhabitants may no longer amount to much, but they are still valuable as museum attendants and tour guides.

And why is the European race doomed? Media and Advertisement brainwash to  miscegenation with pagans.

Pew Research 2010 found that 69% of people surveyed said that single women having children is a bad thing, 43% say unmarried couples raising children is a bad thing, yet hypocritically only 14% say interracial marriage is a bad thing. There is something particularly dumb about being in favour of interracial relationships, while at the same time conceding the self-destructive outcomes of those relationships.

As I recently wrote: The CFR calls on governments to direct propaganda (genuine Fake News) oan their populations! In fact, Merkel´s genicidal agenda on whites was ordered by Rothschild´s Jesuit Council on Foreign Relations

Christopher Cantwell 24 June 2018:  (US conditions) Since 1980, the total percent of interracial marriages has risen from 3.2% to 8.4%. Of new marriages, the rate rose from 6.7% to 15.1%. In 2010 the most common intermarriage (USA) was white/Hispanic, at 43.3%, other mixed at 30.4%, white/Asian at 14.4% and white/black, the least common, at 11.9%.

A 2015 study examined the outcomes of women that have children with black men, the results were staggering. Currently, 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, however when the mother is white and the father black, the rate jumps to 97%. 98% of white mothers studied reported the father does not support their children financially, 97% report the father is not in the child’s life, and 97% of the women have used welfare to help support themselves and their children.
Among whites in 1958, only 4% approved interracial marriages between whites and blacks; in 2007, 75% of whites reported they approve of such unions.

White people are not the only ones seeing constant images of white women with black men plastered across the Occident. These images have an effect on black men as well. They are being told by the film industry, TV, and advertising, that it is not only natural but also common that white women are choosing black men. When  blacks  find out that this is not the case they turn violent.  

If you wanted to create a chaotic society that is easy to lord over, you would ensure that the children are raised by the state, the women are dependent upon the state, and that the men were marginalized and seen as social pariahs by their own people. What better way to destroy a people than to promote a(n interracial)  relationship that can never produce white children and that is by nature dysgenic?

Posted in english, euromed | Comments Off on Infernal Banquet: Russian Blogger´s Obituary about Europe. Russian Foreign Minister: “Europe Committing Suicide”

Corporate Media Launching Fake News, Calling Facts “Fake News”, Thus Confirming Their Own Dishonesty

This month the EU Parliament will pass strict legislation on copy rights – enabling the establishment to stop the propagation of facts, even linking to them,  necessary to implement its dirty subversion of the existing order in favour of its NWO Communism/Technocracy – a 130 year-old endeavour.

The following illustrates the morality and dishonesty  of the Masonic corporate media.

I bring this post at the request of Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Global Res. 30 June 2018

While the independent and alternative media (including Global Research) are accused without evidence of publishing “fake news”, the routine publication of  “fake news” by the corporate media is invariably overlooked. 

While those who criticize the mainstream media are tagged as “conspiracy theorists”, the evidence amply confirms that the corporate media is involved in the publication of “fake images” and “fake video footage.”

And now the European Union is contemplating the adoption of laws which criminalize “fake news”: 

“Is criminalizing fake news the way forward? German lawmakers have called for legal action against the production and distribution of fake news. But digital rights groups warned of the harrowing effects it could have online, including censorship.” (Deutsche Welle, December 14, 2016)

This proposed legal action is largely intended to “go after” the independent online media and social media which is challenging mainstream media reports. 

In this article we will focus on the news coverage pertaining to a selection of important events including the March 2016 Brussels terror attacks in which fake videos and/or fake images were used by the corporate media with a view to deliberately misleading public opinion. 

1. The Brussels Terrorist Attacks, March 2016

The First Fake Surveillance Video Footage at Brussels Airport

The evidence amply confirms that the Belgian Media Used fake video footage with regard to both the morning terrorist bomb attack at Brussels airport as well as at the afternoon attack at the metro station

Brussels News media Dernière Heure at dhnet.be as well as La Libre reported on the terror attacks by providing a CC Camera Airport Surveillance Video of the terror attacks. 

The published video footage was fake as documented by a blog posting on Media Part

The video pertains to a terror attack at Moscow’s Domodedovo airport on 24 January 2011 (posted on youtube in November 2013).

The  report of DHnet.be on the Brussels airport attack used the video of the Moscow 2011 attack with the date of the Brussels attack: (22/03/2016) pasted onto the Russian video.

Below is the screenshot of DH’s report.

And the screenshot of  La Libre at http://lalibre.be,

And here is a screenshot of the January 2011 terror attack at Moscow’s Domodedova International Airport published on youtube in November 2013 followed by the full youtube video of the Moscow attack:

Our apologies says the VRT TV network (Dutch language) which broadcast the Moscow airport terror attack:

” Surveillance images circulating of attack Zaventem are old pictures. Our apologies.” (author’s Translation)

According to the BBC (January 24, 2011) report (which includes the video), the Moscow 2011 airport attack  resulted in 35 dead.

The Second Fake Surveillance Video at Brussels Maelbeek Metro Station 

The terror attack in the afternoon of March 22 at Brussels Maelbeek Metro station was reported by mainstream media including CNN.

In these reports, video footage from a 2011 terror attack in Minsk, Belarus was used by network TV and online media to describe what was happening in the metro station at the time of the attacks.

Comparisons: Brussels, 22 March 2016 versus Minsk, 11 April 2011. Same video footage

Here is a screenshot of  video footage broadcast on network TV and on the internet depicting the explosion in the Metro in Brussels, March 22, 2016

Here is the alleged video footage of the CCTV surveillance camera, Brussel Maelbeek Metro Station.  The CC surveillance camera is under control of the Metro security authorities.

Now Compare the above to the screenshot of  the Minsk April 2011 attacks followed by full-length video.

 Full video of the Minsk Attack

The Mainstream media’s response

According to the Independent:

CCTV footage that was shared after the Brussels attacks, believed to show video from inside Maelbeek Metro station, has been proven fake.

As news emerged of the third explosion in the Belgian capital, which targeted the station situated near EU offices, many began sharing what they believed to be footage of the bombing.

However it was soon discovered that the video in fact came from the Minsk Metro bombing of 2011 that killed 15 and injured over 200 people.

The Independent’s report is based on a fallacy.

It was the mainstream media that published the Moscow and Minsk video footages.

It was thanks to incisive social media blog reports that the use of fake videos by the mainstream media was revealed.

The more fundamental question: Two cases of fake videos on the same day. A coincidence? 

Can we trust the mainstream media reports concerning the Brussels terror attacks?

Read Complete article on Brussels Fake Videos

2. Coverage of Syria War: BBC Switches Images

According to Sifty News

“The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has been slammed for mistakenly using a photo taken in Iraq in 2003 to illustrate the Syria 2012 massacre, in which over 100 people, including 32 children, were brutally killed.

The picture, taken on March 27, 2003, showed a young Iraqi child jumping over dozens of white body bags containing skeletons found in a desert south of Baghdad.

It was posted on the BBC news website under the heading “Syria massacre in Houla condemned as outrage grows”.

According to The Telegraph, the caption stated the photograph was provided by an activist and cannot be independently verified, but said it is “believed to show the bodies of children in Houla awaiting burial”.

Screenshot from the Telegraph, May 27, 2012

We’re Sorry Says the BBC (this is one among many cases of switched images and media manipulation (not to mention the white helmets) pertaining to the war in Syria.

A BBC spokesman said the image has now been removed from the website.

“We were aware of this image being widely circulated on the internet in the early hours of this morning following the most recent atrocities in Syria. We used it with a clear disclaimer saying it could not be independently verified,” the spokesman said.

Meanwhile, a professional photographer, Marco di Lauro, said he nearly “fell off his chair” when he saw the image being used, and said he was “astonished” at the failure of the corporation to check their sources.

“What I am really astonished by is that a news organization like the BBC doesn’t check the sources and it’s willing to publish any picture sent it by anyone activist, citizen journalist or whatever. That’s all,” the paper quoted him, as saying. ( Sifty News)

3. NATO’s “Liberation” of  Tripoli, September 2011

September 2011: The international community, we are told,  is waging a “humanitarian war”. And the people of Libya are rejoicing. “NATO has liberated Libya from the tyranny of Muammar Ghadaffi” 

Green Square Tripoli. Libyans are seen celebrating the victory of rebel forces (affiliated to Al Qaeda) over Ghadaffi in this BBC News Report (see below)

Examine the footage:.

It’s not Green Square and it’s not the King Idris Flag (red, black green) of the Rebels.  

Its the Indian flag (orange, white and green) and the people at the rally are Indians.

Perhaps you did not even notice it.

And if you did notice, “it was probably a mistake”.

Sloppy journalism at the BBC or outright Lies and Fabrications? Recognize the flags?

Indian Flag  (see right)

Libya’s Rebel Flag (King Idris)

This is not the first time images have been manipulated or switched.

In fact it seems to be a routine practice of the mainstream media

Terrorists “celebrating” in Green Square

There is no celebration. It is a NATO sponsored massacre which has resulted in several thousand deaths.

But the truth cannot be shown on network television. The impacts of NATO bombings have been obfuscated.

The rebels are heralded as “liberators”.

Screenshot of the above video

NATO bombing is intended to save civilian lives under The Alliance’s R2P mandate.  But the realities are otherwise: the civilian population is being terrorized by the NATO sponsored rebels.

The images must be switched to conform to the “NATO consensus”.

Death and destruction is replaced by fabricated images of celebration and liberation.

4. The Lhasa Riots, Tibet. March 14, 2008

On the day of the Lhasa Riots (March 14, 2008), the videotape presented by CNN in its News Report on the 14th of March (1.00pm EST) was manipulated.

The message to be conveyed is that Chinese cops were involved in brutally repressing a civilian protest movement including Budhist monks in Tibet’s capital city: Lhasa.

VIDEO: Tibet monks protest against Chinese rulers (CNN, March 14, 2008)

The video footage, which accompanied CNN’s John Vause’s report, had nothing to do with China.

The police were not Chinese, but Indian cops in khaki uniforms from the North-eastern State of Himachal Pradesh, India.

Viewers were led to believe that demonstrations inside China were peaceful and that people were being arrested and brutalised by Chinese cops.

Chinese Cops in Khaki Uniforms

1′.27-1′.44″ video footage of “Chinese cops” and demonstrators including Buddhist monks. Chinese cops are shown next to Tibetan monks.

Are these Chinese Cops from Gansu Province or Lhasa, the Tibetan capital, as suggested by CNN’s John Vause’s Report?

REPORT ON CHINA, MARCH 14


Alleged Chinese cops repressing Tibet demonstrators in China , CNN, March 14, 2008  1′.36”

Alleged Chinese cops in khaki uniforms repressing Tibet demonstrators in China, CNN, March 14, 2008  1’40”

Their khaki uniforms with berets seem to bear the imprint of the British colonial period.

Khaki colored uniforms were first introduced in the British cavalry in India in 1846.

Khaki means “dust” in Hindi and Persian.

Moreover, the cops with khaki uniforms and mustache do not look Chinese.

Look carefully.

They are Indian cops.

The videotape shown on March 14 by CNN is not from China (Gansu Province or Lhasa, Tibet’s Capital). The video was taken in the State of Himachal Pradesh, India. The videotape of the Tibet protest movement in India was used in the CNN report on the Tibet protest movement within China.

In a March 13 Report by CNN, demonstrators are being arrested by Indian police in khaki uniforms during a protest march at Dehra, about 50 km from Dharamsala in the northern state of Himachal Pradesh.

VIDEO; Tibet Protest movement in India, CNN, March 13, 2008

Indian police arrested around 100 Tibetans on Thursday, dragging them into waiting police vans, as they tried to march to the Chinese border to press claims for independence and protest the Beijing Olympics.” (REUTERS/Abhishek Madhukar (INDIA))

Below are images from the CNN’s report on March 13, on the protest movement in Himachal Pradesh, India:

Compare these images to those in the March 14 CNN report. Same cops, same uniforms, same Indian style moustache

CNN MARCH 13 REPORT ON INDIA


Indian cops repressing Tibetan demonstrators in Himachal Pradesh, India CNN, March 13, 2008  0′.53″


Indian cops repressing Tibet demonstrators in Himachal Pradesh, India CNN, March 13, 2008  1′.02″


Indian cops repressing Tibet demonstrators in Himachal Pradesh, India CNN, March 13, 2008, 1′.18″


Indian cops repressing Tibetan demonstrators in Himachal Pradesh, India CNN, March 13, 2008  2.04″

The CNN’s March 14 report on the Tibet Protest movement in China shows Chinese cops in khaki uniforms, yellow lapels and berets.

While the videotape is not identical to that of March 13 in India , CNN’s coverage of the events in China on March 14 used a videotape taken from the coverage of the Tibet Protest movement in India on March 13, with Indian cops in khaki uniforms.

The protest movement in India on March 13 was “peaceful”. It was organised by the Dalai Lama’s “government in exile”. It took place within 50 km of the headquarters of the Dalai Lama in Dharamsala.

The Western media was invited in to film the event, and take pictures of Buddhist monks involved in a peaceful, nonviolent march. These are the pictures which circled the World.

So what has occurred is that CNN  has copied and pasted its own videotape of the Tibet Protest movement in India and has fabricated a Gansu Province/ Lhasa, China “peaceful” protest movement with Chinese cops in khaki British colonial style uniforms.

The Chinese never adopted the British style khaki uniform and beret.

The uniforms of the alleged (fake) Chinese cops displayed in the CNN report do not correspond to those used by the police in China. (See photograph below, real Chinese cops)


No khaki uniforms in China. These are the uniforms of China’s “Armed Police”.

The foregoing are selected illustrations of “fake news”, which we have been able to corroborate.

They are but the tip of the iceberg in the barrage of daily media disinformation, distortion and omission.

The evidence is compelling. Should the media be held accountable?

Please forward this article and post on social media.

Posted in english, euromed | Comments Off on Corporate Media Launching Fake News, Calling Facts “Fake News”, Thus Confirming Their Own Dishonesty

EUs Migrations-Gipfel: Merkel wird Populistin, um Job zu retten! Inhalt: Wahrscheinlich undurchführbare Absichtserklärung. CSU Konfrontiert daher weiterhin Merkel

Der EU-Migranten-Gipfel am 28./29. Juni 2018 endete mit einem Kompromiss, einer Absichtserklärung, die auf dem Papier hart erscheint – aber wahrscheinlich nicht praktikabel ist.

Daher: ZDF  29 Juni 2018: Nach den Ergebnissen aus Brüssel gibt es wieder Misstöne aus Bayern. (Secretary General of the CSU Alexander) Dobrindt will an dem Plan festhalten, bestimmte Migranten an der Grenze abweisen zu können.
Der Europäische Rat habe den Kurs der CSU “bestätigt, europäische Lösungen und nationale Maßnahmen zu verbinden. Wir sind bereit das aufzugreifen, und halten nationale Maßnahmen weiter für notwendig”, so Dobrindt weiter.

DER EU-MIGRATIONSVERTRAG AUF EINEN bLICK  (The Daily Mail 29 June 2018): 

Ausschiffungsplattformen

Um die Mittelmeerüberquerungen abzuwehren, verpflichteten sich die Staats- und Regierungschefs, das immer noch vage Konzept von “regionalen Ausschiffungsplattformen” außerhalb Europas für Migranten, die aus internationalen Gewässern gerettet wurden, “zu erkunden“.

Sie versprachen, mit dem Büro des Hohen Flüchtlingskommissars (UNHCR) und der Internationalen Organisation für Migration (IOM) zusammenzuarbeiten. (Und sie widersetzen sich “Ausschiffungsplattformen ausserhalb Europas” gem. ihrer  Coudenhove Kalergi-Ideologie).

Bislang hat kein Drittland angeboten, diese Aufnahmezentren zu beherbergen, in denen die Behörden irreguläre Migranten und in die EU zulässige Asylbewerber unterscheiden würden.

Marokko hat sich am Donnerstag ausgeschlossen, und die Idee hat in den europäischen Hauptstädten Zweifel hinsichtlich ihrer Vereinbarkeit mit dem Völkerrecht aufkommen lassen.

“Kontrollierte Zentren”
Demnach können in der EU aufgespürte und in der EU zurückgehaltene Migranten in “kontrollierte Zentren” auf dem Territorium der EU angebracht werden, von wo aus akzeptierte Asylbewerber  in den gesamten Block umgesiedelt oder in ihr Heimatland zurückgeschickt werden können wenn nickt akzeptiert.

Aber ihre Schaffung, die mit EU-Geldern bezahlt werden würde, liegt im Ermessen der Mitgliedstaaten “auf freiwilliger Basis”, ebenso wie die Umsiedlung von Asylbewerbern, die dort festgehalten werden.

Italien, das den Vorschlag begrüßt, hat nicht angegeben, ob es solche Zentren auf seinem Boden schaffen würde.

Der Begriff “kontrollierte” Zentren wurde gegenüber “geschlossen” bevorzugt, wie von Frankreich vorgeschlagen.

“Sekundäre Bewegungen”
Der Kompromiss enthält einen Absatz zur Eindämmung der Migration von Migranten zwischen den EU-Ländern.

So genannte Sekundärbewegungen stehen im Zentrum der Spannungen zwischen der deutschen Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel und ihrem wichtigsten Regierungsverbündeten, der CSU, die einseitig drohte, Einwanderer, die   bereits anderswo registriert sind, bei ihrer Ankunft an der deutschen Grenze zurückzuweisen.

“Die Mitgliedstaaten sollten alle notwendigen internen legislativen und administrativen Maßnahmen ergreifen, um solchen Bewegungen entgegenzuwirken und zu diesem Zweck eng zusammenarbeiten”, hieß es in den Schlussfolgerungen.

Außengrenzen
Das Abkommen sieht vor, die Ressourcen der Europäischen Agentur für Grenzschutz Frontex (ohne Angabe von Zahlen) aufzustocken und ihr ein breiteres Mandat zu erteilen.

Es plant auch, die Unterstützung der libyschen Küstenwache zu verstärken und ruft in einer Warnung an NGOs “alle Schiffe, die im Mittelmeerraum operieren” dazu auf, die geltenden Gesetze einzuhalten und die libyschen Küstenwachen nicht zu behindern (um Migranten zu ergattern und dafür Geld zu bekommen).

In einem von Malta und Italien besonders geschätzten Teil stimmten die 28 Staats- und Regierungschefs darin überein, die zweite Tranche in Höhe von drei Milliarden Euro für die Unterstützung von Flüchtlingen in der Türkei freizugeben und einen Beitrag zum EU-Fonds für Afrika zu leisten, um die Migration nach Europa zu verlangsamen.

Dublin-Verordnung
Der Gipfel sollte einen Kompromiss zu dieser europäischen Gesetzgebung bringen, die die Verantwortung für die Bearbeitung eines Asylantrags dem Land des ersten Beitritts überträgt.

Aber die Unterschiede sind noch zu groß, als dass Änderungen möglich wären.

“Es muss ein Konsens über die Dublin-Verordnung gefunden werden, damit sie auf der Grundlage eines ausgewogenen Verhältnisses zwischen Verantwortung und Solidarität reformiert wird”, heißt es in dem Abkommen über eine seit Jahren festgefahrene Reform.

Die Kommission schlägt vor, in Krisenzeiten von diesem Grundsatz abzuweichen, indem Asylbewerber von ihrem Ankunftsort aus umverteilt werden.

Aber Länder wie Ungarn und Polen, die von Österreich unterstützt werden, widersetzen sich dieser Idee.

Italien fordert ein ständiges Verteilungssystem und dass das Prinzip der Verantwortung des Ankunftslandes  gänzlich aufgegeben werde.

DWN 29 June 2018 und  The Guardian 29 Juni stimmt zu.

DW 29 June 2018: Der Gipfel gab der deutschen Kanzlerin nur wenige praktische Lösungen. Ihre Strategie der Abschreckung mag hart klingen, aber in Bezug auf die (Verrriegelung) der Route zwischen Libyen und Italien ist sie immer noch eine Erfindung der EU.

Es ist so giftig. Sie gehen in den Raum, stoßen aufeinander, stürmen hinaus, gehen wieder zurück, stoßen wieder zusammen. Kein Ende in Sicht «, sagte ein verärgerter Diplomat, als sich die Dämmerung näherte.

Die EU möchte ihre Partnerschaft mit Libyen überall stärken, wo Migranten mit Ausbeutung und Folter konfrontiert sind. Die libysche Küstenwache, die bereits von der EU unterstützt wird, wird in Zukunft für das Aufischen von Migranten aus einem viel größeren Mittelmeerraum verantwortlich sein. Das Ziel ist klar: Menschen, die sich auf See in Gefahr gebracht haben, werden wieder dorthin zurückgeschickt, wo sie hergekommen sind. Anders ausgedrückt: Abschreckung.

Viel Geld
wird diese Strategie verschleiern, ebenso wie das Lob für die Zusammenarbeit zwischen der EU und Afrika, die in den nächsten Jahrzehnten Ergebnisse zeigen soll (die aber seit dem Start des Euromediterranen Prozesses vor 23 Jahren und der Mittelmeer-Union  vor 10 Jahren nichts gebracht hat).
Aufnahmezentren im (EU)Block werden geschlossen. So hat Italien seinen Wunsch zumindest auf dem Papier erfüllt bekommen.

Im Wesentlichen beabsichtigt  die EU die Einrichtung von Migrantenbearbeitungszentren in Ländern wie Algerien, Ägypten, Libyen, Marokko, Niger und Tunesien. EU-Mittel wären verfügbar, um die Länder zur Unterzeichnung zu bewegen, aber bisher haben keine Länder zugestimmt, während ein Paar sich selbst ausgeschlossen hat.

Europas freimaurerischer Untergang

Wo genau die Zentren aufzustellen sind   und wie genau sie bewacht werden, bleibt abzuwarten. Laut der Gipfelvereinbarung sollten sie kein zusätzlicher Anreiz sein, den Weg in die EU zu gehen.
Der Durchbruch am Donnerstag ist vorübergehend. Das Kernproblem der EU – die Solidarität in Bezug auf die Migration zwischen ihren Mitgliedstaaten – wurde nicht gelöst, sondern erst auf einen späteren Zeitpunkt verschoben.Auch hier kommt die Orbanisierung voran, denn es gibt keine neuen Regeln darüber, wer für Asylanträge zuständig ist. Dublin bleibt in Kraft.

Kommentare
Merkel hat den Einwanderungsimport der EU 2015 durch ihre Politik der offenen Arme akzentuiert. Aber der destruktive Verrat geht auf die 1970er Jahre zurück, als verrückte Mitglieder des Europarates begannen, den ständig wachsenden Geburtenüberschuss muslimischer Länder mit ihren grossen Familien als “Wanderarbeitskraft” zu importieren. Verachtung vor dem Westen, seiner Kultur und Religion im schlimmsten Illuminati-Stil entfaltete sich in den Sitzungen (Bat Ye’or: Eurabia 2005, SS. 168-172).

Jetzt hat Merkel ein gemeinsames EU-Dokument erhalten, das das Papier, auf dem es geschrieben ist, kaum wert ist: Es ist eine Reihe von Erklärungen für undurchführbare Maßnahmen. Ob diese Bekehrung der Merkel zum “Populismus”, den sie laut vielen ihrer Aussagen dermassen verachtet,  reicht, um ihren Job als NGO Germany’s CEO zu retten – gem. dem  früheren Vizekanzler Siegmar Gabriel  (unten) – ist zweifelhaft:

Dieser Kompromiss wird vielleicht kurzfristig das  köstliche Vertrauen der Afrikaner retten – wie von Merkel und Rothschild-Banker Macron und ihrem Meister und hier, dem Rothschild-Agenten, George Soros, gewünscht, aber selbst sie werden die Wirklichkeit einsehen.

Gem. der ARD haben Griechenland und Spanien zugesagt, Sekundärmigranten zurückzunehmen –  fordern aber für viele Migranten eine Familienzusammenführung in Deutschland. Italien hat kein Versprechen gegeben.

Die EU bekämpft Muslime nicht – sondern lädt sie ein, sich hier niederzulassen

ABER WAS DENKEN EUROPÄISCHE VÖLKER ÜBER MERKELS OFFENE ARME GEGENÜBER MIGRANTEN?-

Breitbart 28 June 2018: Zweiundvierzig Abgeordnete der Anti-Massenmigrations-Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) haben sich für eine Initiative zur Bekämpfung von Menschenhandel gegen deutsche Migranten-Verkehrs-NGOs eingesetzt, die ihrer Meinung nach “gestoppt werden müssen”.
Sie machen damit eine Menge Geld”, sagte Bystron zu Breitbart London. “SOS Mediterranée macht vier Millionen Euro pro Jahr, eine andere 1,7 Millionen und die kleinste, die jetzt gefangen wurde, eine Viertelmillion im Jahr.”

Hungary Today:  Die Mehrheit der Menschen in den mittel-, ost- und südeuropäischen Ländern sind gegen Migration und halten die Erhaltung der christlichen Kultur für wichtig, wie eine neue Umfrage des Nezopont Institute am Donnerstag zeigt.

Ganze 74% der Befragten waren der Ansicht, dass die Einwanderung von außerhalb des Kontinents für Europa “nicht gut” sei. Am niedrigsten war das Verhältnis in Deutschland und Österreich, wo 53 bzw. 56%  gegen Migration waren. Diejenigen, die sagen, die Migration sei gut für die EU, betrugen 5 Prozent in Ungarn, 8 Prozent in Bulgarien, 11 Prozent in der Slowakei und 13 Prozent in der Tschechischen Republik, sagte Nezopont.

 

Posted in deutsch, euromed | Comments Off on EUs Migrations-Gipfel: Merkel wird Populistin, um Job zu retten! Inhalt: Wahrscheinlich undurchführbare Absichtserklärung. CSU Konfrontiert daher weiterhin Merkel

EU´s Summit on Migration: Merkel Becomes Populist to Keep Job! Contents: Probabliy impracticable Declaration of Intent. So CSU Goes on Confronting Merkel

The EU Migrant Summit on 28/29 June 2018 ended in a compromise, a declaration of intent  which seems hard on paper – but is probably impracticable.

Therefore:  The ZDF  29 June 2018 After the results from Brussels there is again discord from Bavaria. (Secretary General of the CSU Alexander) Dobrindt wants to stick to the plan to reject certain migrants on the border.
“The European Council has endorsed the course of the CSU” to combine European solutions and national action, we are ready to take action and continue to consider national action   necessary, “Dobrindt added.

THE EU MIGRATION DEAL AT A GLANCE (The Daily Mail 29 June 2018):

Disembarkation platforms
To deter Mediterranean crossings, the leaders pledged to ‘swiftly explore’ the still vague concept of ‘regional disembarkation platforms’ outside Europe for migrants rescued from international waters.

They promised to work in cooperation with the Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) (And they are opposed to platforms outside Europe in concordance with their  Coudenhove Kalergi ideology).

No third country has so far offered to host these reception centres, where authorities would distinguish between irregular migrants and asylum seekers admissible into the EU.

Morocco on Thursday ruled itself out and the idea has raised doubts in European capitals about its compatibility with international law.

‘Controlled centres’
According to the deal, migrants found and held in the EU can be moved to ‘controlled centres’ on EU territory from where they will be able to be relocated throughout the bloc if eligible for asylum and returned to their country if they are not.

But their creation, which would be paid for with EU money, is left to the discretion of member states ‘on a voluntary basis’ as would be the relocation of asylum seekers held there.

Italy, which welcomed the proposal, did not specify whether it would create such centres on its soil.

The term ‘controlled’ centres was preferred over ‘closed’ as proposed by France.

‘Secondary movements’
The compromise includes a paragraph for curbing the movement of migrants between EU countries.

So-called secondary movements are at the heart of tensions between German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her main government ally, the CSU, which threatened to unilaterally turn back migrants already registered elsewhere upon arrival on the German border.

‘Member states should take all necessary internal legislative and administrative measures to counter such movements and closely cooperate amongst each other to this end,’ the conclusions said.

External borders
The agreement provides for increasing the resources of the European Border Guard Agency, Frontex, (without providing figures) and giving it a broader mandate.

It also plans to strengthen support to the Libyan Coast Guard, and in a warning to NGOs, calls on ‘all vessels operating in the Mediterranean’ to comply with applicable laws and not obstruct Libyan coast guard operations (in order to get hold of migrants and to receive money for it).

In a section particularly appreciated by Malta and Italy, the 28 leaders agreed to release the second three-billion-euro tranche of the fund to help refugees in Turkey and to contribute to the EU fund for Africa, in order to slow migration into Europe at its starting point.

Dublin Regulation
The summit was supposed to unfold a compromise on this European legislation which entrusts responsibility for processing an asylum application to the country of first entry.

But the differences are still too great for amendments to be made.

‘A consensus must be found on the Dublin Regulation so that it is reformed on the basis of a balance between responsibility and solidarity,’ the agreement said of a reform that has been bogged down for years.

The Commission proposes to derogate from this principle in times of crisis, with asylum seekers being redistributed from their place of arrival.

But countries such as Hungary and Poland, supported by Austria, oppose this idea head-on.

Italy calls for a permanent system of distribution and for the principle of the responsibility of the country of arrival to be abandoned altogether.

DWN 29 June 2018: The EU decides on higher payments to North African States
The EU Summit on the asylum issue has brought no concrete  solutions in  handling refugees and migrants within the EU. The Guardian 29 June agrees.

DW 29 June 2018:  The summit gave the German chancellor few practical solutions. Its strategy of deterrence might sound tough, but regarding the Libya-Italy route, it’s still a figment of the EU’s imagination.

  ‘It is so toxic. They go into the room, clash, storm out, go back again, clash again. With no end in sight,’ said one exasperated diplomat as dawn approached.

The EU wants to strengthen its partnership with Libya of all places, where migrants face exploitation and torture. The Libyan coast guard, already receiving EU support, will in future be responsible for fishing migrants out of a much larger area of the Mediterranean. The objective is clear: People who’ve put themselves in danger at sea will be sent back to where they came from. Another way to put it: deterrence.

Lots of money will cloak this strategy, as will the praise for EU-African cooperation, which is supposed to show results over the next decades (but has not since the Eurromediterranean Process 23 years ago and the Union for the Mediterrenean were launched 10 years ago).
Reception centers in the bloc will be closed. So, Italy got its wish, at least on paper.

In essence,  the EU means to establixsh  migrant processing centres in countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Niger and Tunisia. EU funds would be available to persuade countries to sign on, but so far no countries have agreed, while a couple have ruled themselves out.

Europe´s Masonic demise

Who exactly will set the centers up and how exactly they will be guarded remains to be seen. According to the summit agreement, they shouldn’t become an additional incentive to make the trek to EU.
The breakthrough on Thursday is temporary. The EU’s core problem – solidarity on migration among its member states – has not been solved, but only put off until a later date. And here again, Orbanizationis making progress because there are no new rules on  who is responsible for asylum applications . Dublin remains in force.

Comments
Merkel accentuated the EU´s migrant import through her open arm policy in 2015. But the destructive treason dates back to the 1970es when Maniac members of the Council of Europe started the import of the ever increasing birth surplus of Muslim countries with their families as “wandering labour”, disparaging the West, its culture and religion in the worst Illuminati style (Bat Ye´or: Eurabia 2005 pp. 168-172).

Now she has obtained a common EU document hardly worth the paper it is written upon: It is aseries of declarations of impracticable measures. But whether Merkel´s conversion to the “populism” which she has so often disparaged  will be enough to save her job  as NGO Germany´s CEO – acc. to former Vice-Chancellor Siegmar Gabriel (below) – is dubious

This  compromise may for a short period of time save  the invaluable confidence of the Africans – as wanted by Merkel and  Rothschild banker Macron and their Master, and here, the Rothschild agent George Soros – but even they will soon see realities.

Acc. to the ARD, Greece and Spain have promised to take secondary migrants back – while demanding family reunion in Germany for many migrants there. Italy has given no promise.  

 The EU does not fight – but invites Muslims to come and settle and here 

 

BUT WHAT DO EUROPEAN PEOPLES THINK ABOUT MERKEL`S OPENARMS TOWARDS MIGRANTS?

Breitbart 28 June 2018
Forty-two MPs of the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany (AfD) have put their names behind an initiative to bring criminal charges of people trafficking against German migrant transport NGOs which they say “must be stopped”.
“They are making a lot of money with this, ” Bystron told Breitbart London. “SOS Mediterranée makes four million [euros] a year, another one, 1.7 million and the smallest one, which has been caught now, a quarter million a year.”

 Hungary Today: The majority of people in the central, eastern and southern European countries are against migration and think preserving Christian culture important, a new survey Nezopont Institute released on Thursday shows.

Fully 74% of respondents thought that immigration from outside the continent was “not good” for Europe. The ratio was lowest in Germany and Austria, where 53 and 56 percent were against migration, respectively. Those saying that migration was good for the EU came to 5 percent in Hungary, 8 percent in Bulgaria, 11 percent in Slovakia and 13 percent in the Czech Republic, Nezopont said.

Posted in english, euromed | Comments Off on EU´s Summit on Migration: Merkel Becomes Populist to Keep Job! Contents: Probabliy impracticable Declaration of Intent. So CSU Goes on Confronting Merkel

Leidenschaftliche Superfreimaurerin NWO-Merkel im Bundestag: Schicksalsfrage für die EU. Meine Multilateralen Werte, und zwar so, dass Afrika daran glaubt, oder (meine/EUs/ City of Londons) Glaubwürdigkeit ist aus!

Kanzlerin Merkel im Bundestag 28. Juni 2018

Es scheint, dass Merkel in der  Frage der freien Muslim-Immigration nach Deutschland  siegen wird  – und dass Seehofer als Innenminister abdanken muss!

Natürlich, denn bei den Illuminaten steht Superfreimaurerin Merkel viel stärker als Seehofer, der schon früher zugestanden hat, welche Kräfte wirklich regieren. Ausserdem sind beide Geschwister der Rotary Club Freimaurer-Logen  (Viele interessante Mitglieder).

Mehr als 30.000 Abschiebungs- “Verurteilte”sind unter Merkels Aufsicht verschwunden. 

Wenn jedoch ein zufriedenstellender EU-Plan zur Lösung der Migrantenkrise nicht erreicht wird –  wolle Seehofer seine Autorität als Minister nutzen, um Migranten, die bereits in einem anderen EU-Land registriert sind (Dublin-Abkommen), zurückzuschicken – und riskiert dabei, gefeuert zu werden.
Natürlich ist Seehofer der Underdog. Schade für Europa.

Tatsache ist, dass Europa nicht kämpft – sondern es lädt Muslime ein, und hier zu kommen und sich niederzulassen -behält sie (fast) alle – und schickt symbolisch nur wenige zurück, die einen Beutel mit unserem Geld bekommen – und sie können später zurückkehren, um die Farce zu wiederholen. 

Wir wissen ja aus dem Mund der jüdischen Illuminaten-Elite, dass wir EU-Bürger Versuchskaninchen ihres NWO-Experiments sind 

DW 28 Juni 2018:

DW 28 June 2018: Zurückgeschickte Asylbewerber.

Bemerkungen
Ich bezweifle, dass die obigen Zahlen richtig sind – sie sind wahrscheinlich manipuliert. Viel zu lange belügen Politiker und ihre Medien uns mit ihren Fake News.

Ich vermute, dass sowohl Seehofers Anti-Migrationsproteste als auch die  des italienischen Innenministers,  Salvini,  freimaurer-regulierte Shows sind, um zunehmend unzufriedene Europäer zu befrieden – während sie weiterhin mitten in der Nacht Muslime einfliegen und schmutzige spitzfindige Kompromisse machen! Deutschland hat gerade eine Luftbrücke für afrikanische Muslime von Italien nach Deutschland eröffnet – um  Präs. Macrons/EUs  Vision von weiteren 200 Mio. Afrikanern in den nächsten 30 Jahren in seinem EurAfrika zu verwirklichen!

Posted in deutsch, euromed | Comments Off on Leidenschaftliche Superfreimaurerin NWO-Merkel im Bundestag: Schicksalsfrage für die EU. Meine Multilateralen Werte, und zwar so, dass Afrika daran glaubt, oder (meine/EUs/ City of Londons) Glaubwürdigkeit ist aus!

Passionate Super Freemason NWO Merkel in German Parliament: Destiny Question for the EU. My Multilateral Values, so that Africa Believes in It, or (my/EU´s/ City of London´s) Credibility Is over!

Chancellor Merkel in German Parliament 28 June 2018:

It seems that Merkel will win the fray over the free Muslim immigration to Germany – and that Minister of the Interior Seehofer has to abdicate!

Of course, because in the Illuminati — Superfreemason Merkel is much stronger than Seehofer, who has previously conceded, which forces really govern: The Illuminati Corporations. In addition, both are siblings of the Rotary Club Masonic lodges:  (Many interestng members!!) Nevertheless, If a satisfactory EU  plan to solve the migrant crisis is not achieved today — Seehofer will use his   authority as a minister to return migrants who already are registrated in another EU Country (The Dublin agreement) – and risk being fired.
Naturally, Seehofer is the underdog. Too bad for Europe. 

The  fact of the matter is: The EU does not fight – but invites Muslims to come and settle and here – keeping all of them- only returning symbolically few who get a bag of our money with them – and they can return later to repeat the farce.

 We know from the mouths of the Jewish Illuminati elite that we EU citizens are guinea pigs of their multiethnic  NWO experiment

DW 28 Juni 2018:

DW 28 June 2018

Comments
I doubt that the above numbers are correct – they have probably been rigged. For too long, politicians and their media have been lying to us with their fake news.

More than 30.000  rejected migrants have “dissappeared” under Merkel´s watch.  

I guess that both Seehofer´s and Italian Salvini´s anti-migration protests are just Mason-regulated shows to satisfy increasingly discontent Europeans – while they continue to import Muslims in the middle of the nightGermany has just opened an airbridge for African Muslims from Italy to Germany in order to fulfil   Pres. Macrons/ EUs  Vision about another  200 mio. Africans in the next 30 years into his EurAfrica!

Posted in english, euromed | Comments Off on Passionate Super Freemason NWO Merkel in German Parliament: Destiny Question for the EU. My Multilateral Values, so that Africa Believes in It, or (my/EU´s/ City of London´s) Credibility Is over!