NWO Hatred II: Approval of “extreme rights” in the Media shocked Worldwide Troublemaker Soros´ Twisted NWO Mouthpiece – The Guardian, the Apologist of Illuminati´s Incredibly Evil “Holy Sin”: Anti-Islamists must be Brainwashed, Reprogrammed, Freedom of Speech Redefined

The New World Order is driven by hatred emanating  from the City of London – and implemented by one single man from Hell: Rothschild agent Geore Soros –  and how he does it by buying and bullying “our” Masonic politicians, i.a. Pres. Trump and Angela Merkel and financers
I have previously written about how Soros manages to let leftist “antifascists” behave like fascists in the name of his/  City of London´s  one-world Communism

George Soros is the Face of the NWO – he is the face of pure hatred – he is the mastermind of exploding hatred in the Western world today – as clearly explained here by David Icke.

Since his boyhood this elitist Jew Soros showed satanic evil, peaching on fellow Jews to the Gestapo in Hungary and taking their possessions when they were sent into concentration camps!

And this photo from EurActiv 28 Oct. 2018 illustrates how Soros makes it:
Faced with the upsurge in xenophobia in Europe (for which they and esp. the  226 MEPs bought by Soros are responsible through promoting Muslim mass immigration) – MEPs want to take firm action against neo-fascist and neo-Nazi groups – never against their Antifa thugs



It is true that both globalists and nationalists represent communist and Zionist branches of Freemasonry.
They wanted the US to be subjected to globalist organizations. This was stopped under Trump.
Like Judaism, communism is a satanic cult that has its origins in Jewish Kabbalism and the Talmud.
The media carry out the most vicious ruthless attacks on Trump, but accuse him of creating an atmosphere of hate. This is classic communism – blame your goal of what you do. (Henry Makow 27 Oct. 2018).
(So ​​far Trump has been making friends with Putin – strongly opposed by the deep state , the neocons and the democrats.


The  Guardian is a participant in Project Syndicate  with  Illuminati contributors like CFR president Richard Hass, CFR distinguuished diplomate Joschka Fischer,  Carl Bildt of the military industrial complex and many other globaliists.established by George Soros acc. to Source Watch.
Therefore,  The  Guardian 12 Febr. 2018 wrote:Soros should be regarded as a saviour of progressive causes. Mr Soros made his by the careful study and exploitation of human irrationality”.
The particular direction of Mr Soros’s philanthropy implies that his opponents are unreasonable as well as wrong. It is astonishing how consistently right Mr Soros has been.
He has supported drug legalisation, equal marriage, and the rights of the Roma people.All have required a change of public attitude as well as of legislation.
On 16 Apr. 2017 , The Guardian wrote about this the dirty tricks that demonise George Soros

   but the deep state , the Democrats and the Neeocons are forcing him to confront Russia.


The following analysis (excerpts) in The Guardian 26 Oct. 2018  brings facts, describes how more and more people see what is destroying the societies they so laboriously built – but then deplores the people behind the resistance and see the masses following them as blind ignorants that must by all means be cut off from free speech and brainwashed into the world-communist NWO ideology. The worst “far right” demagogue is Tommy Robinson aka Yaxley-Lennon (Right)

The tragicomic side of it is that the analysis truthfully describes the atrocities and abominations of invading/imported Islam by an elite that  despises the people who have to pay for and bear the suffering of  a barbarian culture that has conquered most of originally Christian countries and made life there Hell for Christians before practically exterminating them. Where the Muslims took the boys from Christian  families and brainwashed them into fanatic  Muslim Janitshares – used as forefront cannon fodder to overrun Christians, e.g.

The Guardian is an apologist for Islam and criticizes resistance to the leftist elites´ goal of the  demise of Europe in the World Caliphate.
The Guardian laments that the “far right” resistance against its satanist NWO religion/ideology is hampering this New World Order.

The Guardian 26 Oct. 2018:  The real challenge posed by the far right is its success at spreading anti-Muslim and xenophobic attitudes in society at large. The best defence is a political movement that has anti-racism at its core and seeks to give people greater democratic control over the way their society is organised and run (= social engineering/Reprogramming).

The campaign around Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (Tommy Robinson) is just one symptom of a bigger problem – which must be challenged, locally and internationally, before it starts to do serious damage.

But simply pointing out their factual mistakes is insufficient if people have lost trust in you.

“We need a better understanding of what “free speech” is and is not”.
Comment: Here is what the Guardian´s NWO free speech is:
Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who was fined and given a jail sentence for calling Muhammad a pedophileThis is not covered by “free speech”.
Muhammad is held up in Islam as the perfect example of conduct for Muslims (cf. Qur’an 33:21). Accordingly, his example does lead to pedophilia.
On the other side, leftist media can insult Jesus Christ and his followers on a daily basis – unpunished.

Now the Guardian tells us about its fears for  its religious ideology, the NWO
It writes:
Nowhere in western Europe is a far-right movement currently likely to win power through a majority, or even a plurality, of votes. But where they have emerged, they have proved effective at dragging others rightwards: look, for instance, at how Matteo Salvini – a junior partner in Italy’s coalition governmenthas imposed his profoundly racist agenda on his allies.
The risk is that, unless challenged, this broad international effort will join lots of specific local grievances into a single, compelling populist narrative: the globalist elite has failed the native populations of white-majority countries and is destroying them with immigration and multiculturalism.

And The Guardian has the solution: ANTINATIONALISM – PRO-ISLAM BRAINWASHING, and “we need a better understanding of what “free speech” is and is not”!!!- The Guardian does not like free speech discussions !

The newspaper takes its starting point in the terrible Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson,

The Tommy Robinson myth runs something like this: he is an ordinary man who has been trying to alert people to the dangers of Islamic fundamentalism, the true extent of which is denied by the liberal establishment.
For this, he has been persecuted by the state, which keeps trying to imprison him in order to stop him speaking out. This is the image that Yaxley-Lennon and his supporters propagate.

The way Yaxley-Lennon characterises Muslims is to present them as an alien presence in British society working to harm the majority. In Enemy of the State, previously majority-white areas of Luton are described as having suffered “ethnic cleansing” via Muslim immigration. We are sleepwalking our way towards a Muslim takeover of the country.”

One problem is that Yaxley-Lennon does not invent these tropes; he mostly takes them from the mainstream and tries to push them to further extremes.

This man has gathered international sympathy for his fight against the islamisation of the UK – demonstrations in his favour being held wide and far – even nasty Pres. Trump´s son sympathizing with him.

But the majority of protesters were there because they believed that Yaxley-Lennon is being silenced by the British state. Hundreds of thousands of others supported his cause from afar: more than 630,000 people signed a change.org petition calling for his release, a third of them from outside the UK. Solidarity protests were held in Austria, Hungary, Australia and Canada, while a range of rightwing US activists offered their support.

He reinvented himself as an online propagandist.

Yaxley-Lennon’s supporters´ rallying cry is “free speech”, but this is more than an abstract demand: it contains the accusation that ordinary people have been betrayed by a liberal elite that wants to cover up the disastrous consequences of immigration and multiculturalism.

And so it is! I have written on the UN’s commitment to this through the Marrakech Agreement and here, the Global Compact Migrations-Pakt
and the UN-replacement mass immigration as well as the use of the Rothschild agent, George Soros, in promoting mass immigration and here and here in collaboration with super-freemason Angela Merkel.

The successful spread of anti-Muslim and anti-immigration rhetoric has encouraged some conservative politicians to borrow the tropes of the far right. For many years, there was an understanding – not always universally accepted, but with widespread support – that far-right views were outside the acceptable bounds of debate and should be denied a platform.

But the breaking down of these boundaries presents a dilemma: what does the anti-fascist principle of “no platform” mean when a far-right activist has their own independent platform anyway?

The absurdites of Soros´hate preaching has also divided women against men, feminism.
Here Italian feminists protesting ahgainst all men after Muslin rape and killing of 6-year-old Italian drug girl

The growth of this new, international far-right activism has taken many by surprise. Many people see it as the result of technological change, which can be fixed by regulating social media companies. Others regard Yaxley-Lennon and similar far-right celebrities as the embodiment of a legitimate anger that should be given a fair hearing. There is a degree of truth, perhaps, in all of these positions.

In everyday use “Far right” describes a range of extreme nationalist activity, from contesting elections to street protests or violent attacks on minorities and the left, partly  legal.
Comment:It is Soros´ leftist Antifa and even German Social democratic Juso´s paid thugs who are active in violence in Europe´s streets – and in the US it is also leftists paid by Rothschild agent George Soros who are responsible for the riots – Charlottesville, e.g. – framed in the Purple Revolution of the Clintons. At G-20 meetings very violent leftists  paid by Soros ravage the host cities. Where is there an example of “far right” riots in the streets?


Left: Antifa-Victim, an acquaintance of mine, attacked before SIAD demonstration in Copenhagen against Saudian officials wanting to teach us the Kashioggi human rights of Islam

Guardian: In 2017, for example, activists in Europe and Canada crowdfunded tens of thousands of dollars to charter a ship that aimed to disrupt sea rescues in the Mediterranean under the banner “Defend Europe”. This year, claims that farmers in South Africa are victims of “white genocide” have been relayed by a major US TV channel, and then repeated by the US president.
Comment: Such resistance is seen as crime by the Guardian, which does not protest against NGOs and Italian Coastal Guard ships illegally sailing into Libyan waters and ferry millions of migrants to destroy Europe . Nor anyhing about the thheft of the fields of white farmrs in South Africa – to make it another Zimbabwe.

The new far right is defined by its loose networks.

2017 is the year in which the new activism really accelerated, thanks to the series of terrorist attacks in the UK and Europe, and a US president willing to amplify racist memes and marginal far-right activists – such as the tiny UK group Britain First – from around the world.

A recent report by the anti-fascist campaign group Hope Not Hate describes how a range of leading far-right social media accounts, many of which belong to people based in the UK, received huge spikes in new followers after each terrorist attack in Britain last year.

In March 2017, Yaxley-Lennon (Tommy Robinson) attracted tens of thousands of new Twitter followers when he arrived at the Houses of Parliament a few hours after the Westminster Bridge attack to declare that Britain was at “war”. In late May, shortly after the Manchester Arena bombing, told the camera: “In these houses are enemy combatants who want to kill you, maim you and destroy you.” The video has been viewed almost a million times on YouTube.

These protests  represented far-right and conservative activists putting their internal ideological differences aside to unite around a new demand that they hoped had popular appeal: free speech. Since late 2017, Twitter had begun to remove prominent far-right accounts from its service, such as the leaders of Britain First. In March it had deleted the Tommy Robinson account – which by that point had over 400,000 followers.

In recent years, pushed by the election of Donald Trump in the US, and political changes in Europe, we have seen the breaking down of the taboo that kept far-right political ideas largely outside mainstream culture.

The Guardian goes on: Far from being excluded, Yaxley-Lennon has been frequently indulged in the media. 

Why are these changes happening now? Put crudely, this is the fallout from several decades when neoliberal globalisation was seen, to varying degrees, as the only game in town.

In the last week of August 2018, the Tommy Robinson Facebook page posted around two dozen links. These included several stories about the “migrant invasion” of Europe and crimes committed in “Sadiq Khan’s London”; status updates praising far-right demonstrations in Chemnitz, Germany; a piece by the Spectator writer Brendan O’Neill attacking the Guardian journalist Owen Jones; and a Russian television news report on “no-go zones” in Sweden.

Today, the Tommy Robinson Facebook page has more than 950,000 followers.

The 2000s also saw the rise of anti-Muslim activists who were not tied to any party, known as the “counter-jihad” movement. What united them was the idea of an Islamic threat to western civilisation. 

The 2000s also saw the rise of anti-Muslim activists who were not tied to any party, and focused their efforts on building an international network of campaign groups, thinktanks and media outlets known as the “counter-jihad” movement. What unites  them is a  to western civilisation.


Giving the far right a say in any of the complex debates these issues raise is a dead end: their propaganda aims only to incite visceral fears about sex, death and foreigners.

For example, Yaxley-Lennon has frequently campaigned on the issue of “grooming gangs”. This refers to a particular pattern of child abuse, in which teenage girls are sexually exploited by groups of men.
Groups of white men convicted of similar crimes, and victims who aren’t white, have received far less coverage.


The Independent 23 Febr. 2018 : Grooming gangs abused more than 700 women and girls around Newcastle with “arrogant persistence” after police appeared to punish victims while letting the perpetrators walk free, a case review has found.



The Independent 18 March 2018: “I’m a Rotherham grooming gang survivor.  I’m part of the UK’s largest ever child sexual abuse investigation. As a teenager, I was taken to various houses and flats above takeaways in the north of England, to be beaten, tortured and raped over 100 times. I was called a “white slag” and “white c***” as they beat me”. They said I had to “obey” or be beaten”.
Rotherham grooming gangs may have abused more than 1,500 victims.


DW 27 Oct. 20 : Eight Syrian men and one German native were arrested in the idyllic German city of Freiburg on Friday in connection with the rape of an 18-year-old woman..
The incident is the latest in a series of violent acts since 2016 to have rocked the southwestern city.

OK Guardian. Bring a thorough coverage of the white men behind the grooming of white children for the very elite behind the import of the Muslim gangs grooming white girls too. One of these groomers was Jimmy Savile – who abused hundreds of children, covered by the BBC? He provided the highest circles with children to abuse. Write about them, Guardian. For they belong to the elite that are behind the import of the Muslim groomers.  Who allowed him to groom for so many years. Who were the strong forces behind him? Come on, Guardian!!

Who were the white men abusing Lucifer´s bride and sacrificing her babies  to Lucifer (already this name shows in what circles you can find these white men. Or take a look at the persons involved in the Dutroux ring!)

You can have help from investigative journalist   Wayne Madsen, Infowars 30 June 2016:The EU: A Powerhouse Pedophile Hierarchy.

We are many who look forward to you revealing these satanists, Guardian! 

Here is a video describing their satanic child grooming and pedophilia, drinking the blood of chldren and eating their flesh as sacrifices to atan/Lucifer – as described by the girl in the above video.

But considering Jewish Soros´and his acolyte The Guardian´s background one can uunderstand their pedophile sympathies: Muhammad groomed Aisha at her age of 6 years and cosummated the marriage at 9 years – why  marriage of 9-year-old girls is allowed in Islam. And the he supermaster elite´s Talmud  allows mating 3-year-old girls! 

This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.