The Guardian: Jesus Christ Did Live and Die. Shroud of Turin: And He Rose from the Dead

Today is Easter Sunday. Many probably even do not know what that means. But it´as simple as it is incomprehensible: Brutally killed Jesus DID rise from the dead  as he had foretold – even in the presence of many curious eyewitnesses.
In today´s NWO, many claim without any proof that Jesus Christ never existed – that he is just a figment of imagination!  Incredible in these times where science has taken the place of belief – and belief has been replaced by scientific proof.

What is the historical evidence that Jesus Christ lived and died?

The Guardian 14 April 2014: “The historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth is both long-established and widespread. Within a few decades of his supposed lifetime, he is mentioned by Jewish and Roman historians, as well as by dozens of Christian writings. Compare that with, for example, King Arthur, who supposedly lived around AD500. The major historical source for events of that time does not even mention Arthur, and he is first referred to 300 or 400 years after he is supposed to have lived. The evidence for Jesus is not limited to later folklore, as are accounts of Arthur.

What do Christian writings tell us?
The value of this evidence is that it is both early and detailed. The first Christian writings to talk about Jesus are the epistles of St Paul, and scholars agree that the earliest of these letters were written within 25 years of Jesus’s death at the very latest, while the detailed biographical accounts of Jesus in the New Testament gospels date from around 40 years after he died. These all appeared within the lifetimes of numerous eyewitnesses, and provide descriptions that comport with the culture and geography of first-century Palestine.

What did non-Christian authors say about Jesus?
As far as we know, the first author outside the church to mention Jesus is the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who wrote a history of Judaism around AD93. He has two references to Jesus. One of these is controversial because it is thought to be corrupted by Christian scribes (probably turning Josephus’s negative account into a more positive one), but the other is not suspiciousa reference to James, the brother of “Jesus, the so-called Christ”.

About 20 years after Josephus we have the Roman politicians Pliny and Tacitus, who held some of the highest offices of state at the beginning of the second century AD. From Tacitus we learn that Jesus was executed while Pontius Pilate was the Roman prefect in charge of Judaea (AD26-36) and Tiberius was emperor (AD14-37) – reports that fit with the timeframe of the gospels. Pliny contributes the information that, where he was governor in northern Turkey, Christians worshipped Christ as a god. Neither of them liked Christians .

Strikingly, there was never any debate in the ancient world about whether Jesus of Nazareth was a historical figure. In the earliest literature of the Jewish Rabbis, Jesus was denounced as the illegitimate child of Mary and a sorcerer. Among pagans, the satirist Lucian and philosopher Celsus dismissed Jesus as a scoundrel, but we know of no one in the ancient world who questioned whether Jesus lived.

How contoversial is the existence of Jesus today?
In a recent book, the French philosopher Michel Onfray talks of Jesus as a mere hypothesis, his existence as an idea rather than as a historical figure. About 10 years ago, The Jesus Project was set up in the US; one of its main questions for discussion was that of whether or not Jesus existed. Some authors have even argued that Jesus of Nazareth was doubly non-existent, contending that both Jesus and Nazareth are Christian inventions. It is worth noting, though, that the two mainstream historians who have written most against these hypersceptical arguments are atheists: Maurice Casey (formerly of Nottingham University) and Bart Ehrman (University of North Carolina). They have issued stinging criticisms of the “Jesus-myth” approach, branding it pseudo-scholarship. Nevertheless, a recent survey discovered that 40% of adults in England did not believe that Jesus was a real historical figure.

 In some circles, there is still interest in the Shroud of Turin, supposedly Jesus’s burial shroud. Pope Benedict XVI stated that it was something that “no human artistry was capable of producing”.

Even Luciferian Pope Francis speaks of the photo on the Shroud as the photo of “the Lord” – in spite of the forged Vatican C-14 test in 1988.

– whereby we know that he sees Jesus as the the son of Lucifer!!!

  The documents produced by Christian, Jewish and Roman writers form the most significant evidence.

These abundant historical references leave us with little reasonable doubt that Jesus lived and died. The more interesting question – which goes beyond history and objective fact – is whether Jesus died and (then)  lived”.

Which he did and does. AND BOTH HIS DICIPLES BECOMING BLOOD WITNESSES AND THE SHROUD OF TURIN PROVE IT:

Christ left his visiting card: A 3-dimensional photographic negative on his linen burial shroud – below the ne gative of the negative = a positive – today called the Shroud of Turin. The Shroud is recognized as genuine by all branches of science. Much more about it and here. ENEA, the Italian Academy of Science calls the Shroud-photo supernatural because the image-giving technique can only be replicated by means of the world´s strongest UV laser (The Independent 20 Dec. 2011).
No one else in world history before 1850 AD has left such a visiting card. Wikipedia writes: Apart from a very uncertain process used on the Turin Shroud there are no artifacts or descriptions that indicate that anyone even imagined capturing images with light sensitive materials before 1717. Real photos were no produced until 1839 by Louis Daguerres.

 

This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.