Global Warming Scam: Climate Models Result in Temperatures Twice the Real, Measured Temperatures.”Warmists” Desperate. as Trump to End Their Religion/Livelihood/ Life Lie

The untrustworthy IPCC has made the dire prediction that we can expect 4◦C or more of warming by the end of the 21st century if carbon dioxide emissions are not reduced.

Is that true?

The “International Community” in  Paris Dec. 2015 swallowed this bogus willingly – in spite of thousands of scientists calling this postulate a blatant lie and here.
Why? Because they don´t care about the climate. They want one world government with a climate Court of Justice to rule over any environmental issue – from personal preferences, technocratic cramming people into Communist megacities to war and peace – you name it.

Now, NWO forces are mobilizing the “climate scientists” in a march on Washington. These people  are facing  unemployment in their thousands, because President Trump wants to abolish their fraudulent activity.

In addition, apparently the same forces are mobilizing a people´s climate march in protest against Trump slaughtering the NWO-holy climate science swindle.
Notice the communist battle-signal: the clenched fist.



Climate Models for the Layman” by Judith Curry” 2017 documents the failure of the IPCC´climate predictions for the 21. century. The IPCC bases its predictions on computer climate models – i.e provided that this and that prerequisite (human activities)  develop so or so – the atmospheric CO2  will warm the atmosphere so or so much!

This presupposes the truth of the IPCC dogma that the CO2 of the atmosphere is the driver of global warming. As we shall se below, this is not the case. The factual measurements of atmospheric CO2 and temperature disprove this connection.

Dr. Judith Curry is an estimated climate researcher

Summary of Dr. Curry´s paper
Anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change is a theory in which the basic mechanism
is well understood (??), but of which the potential magnitude is highly uncertain.

There is growing evidence that climate models are running too hot and that climate sensitivity to carbon dioxide is at the lower end of the range provided by the IPCC.

The following 2 graphs shows that the difference between the real/measured and the model-projected global warming 1860-2015 (same years for both graphs)

Nevertheless, these lower values of climate sensitivity are not accounted for in IPCC
climate model projections of temperature at the end of the 21st century or in estimates
of the impact on temperatures of reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

The IPCC climate model projections focus on the response of the climate to different scenarios of emissions.

The 21st century climate model projections do not include:

• a range of scenarios for volcanic eruptions (the models assume that the volcanic
activity will be comparable to the 20th century, which had much lower volcanic
activity than the 19th century
• a possible scenario of solar cooling, analogous to the solar minimum being predicted
by Russian scientists
• the possibility that climate sensitivity is a factor of two lower than that simulated by most climate models
• realistic simulations of the phasing and amplitude of decadal- to century-scale
natural internal variability.

The following graph shows the total insecurity as for warming prediction of the 21. century. The science is certainly not settled

The climate modelling community has been focused on the response of the climate to increased human caused emissions, and the policy community accepts (either explicitly or implicitly) the results of the 21st century Gobal Climate Model simulations as actual predictions.
Hence we don’t have a good understanding of the relative climate impacts of
the above or their potential impacts on the evolution of the 21st century climate.

What does the preceding analysis imply for the IPCC’s ‘extremely likely’ attribution
of anthropogenically caused warming since 1950? Climate models imply that all of
the warming since 1950 can be attributed to humans. However, there have been
large variations in global/hemispheric climate on timescales of 30 years, which are
the same duration as the late 20th century warming. The IPCC does not have convincing
explanations for previous 30-year periods in the 20th century, notably the warm-ing from 1910 to 1940 and the grand hiatus of 1940–1975.
Further, there is a secular warming trend at least since 1800 (and possibly as long as 400 years) that cannot be explained by carbon dioxide, and is only partly explained by volcanic eruptions.

The Temperature increase in climate models  is substantially larger than the observed trend over the past 15 years.
Regarding projections for the period 2015–2035, the 5–95% range for
the trend of the CMIP5 climate model simulations is 0.11–0.41◦C per decade.

However, the implied rates of warming over the period from 1986–2005 to 2016–2035 are lower as a result of the hiatus: 0.10◦C–0.23◦C per decade.

Former Chairman of the IPCC at the time of the climate scandals 1 and 2 was Rajendra Pachauri.  After the climategate, in an interview with the Times of India, Pachauri said  he was happy that the truth had come out  – and that “climate science” is politically commissioned fabrication for political purposes!

The real factor in the dicussion about man-made global warming is not being discussed: The ongoing Solar radiation management (chemtrails) – denied by the warmists  as conspiracy theory.
Nevertheless, in the IPCC´s AR5 Report on SPM 21, the following is stated: “Limited evidence precludes a comprehensive quantitative assessment of both Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and their impact on the climate system.If SRM were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly to values consistent with the greenhouse gas forcing. CDR and SRM methods carry side effects and long-term consequences on a global scale”.

The chemtrails form cirrhus clouds – and as Dane Wigington writes on 21 Febr. 2017: Of all the threats we face, the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare assault is the single greatest short of nuclear cataclysm.

Because of this weather tampering, we now have drought where rain was once plentiful and monsoons where there was drought.

Effect of cirrhus clouds: 1. High altitude ice crystal clouds (chemtrails) reflect less energy, but trap more heat emitted from the surface of the earth. High, thin hazy clouds that are created by aircraft chemtrails are warming the planet!


So these scientists think that by blocking the irradiation of sunlight, they can cool our normal globe (for the benefit of the chemtrail industry and to the detriment of mankind)!
Although they know better: The sun irradiation obstruction does not outweigh the obstruction of global heat to space.

The high peaks are El nino years – unassociated with global warming. Dr. Mann´s “hockeystick” theory was exposed as a blatant scam based on 12 Jamal trees of undocumented origin!  There is no correlation between atmospheric CO2 and temperature.

Below: In the history of the earth there is no correlation between atmospheric temperature and CO2. 450 years ago atmospheric CO2 wa 10 times higher than  now – and it was ice age.

 Below, the total CO2 of the atmosphere is shown (red line). The blue line shows accumulated human contribution to atmospheric CO2 since 1750 (Siddons & d´Aleo).
Human activity is insignificant in relation to atmospheric CO2

This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Global Warming Scam: Climate Models Result in Temperatures Twice the Real, Measured Temperatures.”Warmists” Desperate. as Trump to End Their Religion/Livelihood/ Life Lie

  1. Pingback: ”Alle “Erderwärmung” manipulierte Zahlen” (Peer-Artikel). Unglaublicher Betrug der “Klima-Gurus” enthüllt – und von Medien verschwiegen. | Der Honigmann sagt...

Comments are closed.