PROTOCOL OF THE WISE ELDERS OF ZION No. 3: “WE SUPPORT COMMUNISM”
7. We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces – Socialists, Anarchists, Communists – to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our SOCIAL MASONRY. Our power is in the chronic shortness of food and physical weakness of the worker because by all that this implies he is made the slave of our will. Hunger creates the right of capital to rule the worker more surely than it was given to the aristocracy by the legal authority of kings.
8. By want and the envy and hatred which it engenders we shall move the mobs and with their hands we shall wipe out all those who hinder us on our way.
11. THIS HATRED WILL BE STILL FURTHER MAGNIFIED BY THE EFFECTS of an ECONOMIC CRISES, which will stop dealing on the exchanges and bring industry to a standstil.
WE SHALL THROW UPON THE STREETS WHOLE MOBS OF WORKERS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN ALL THE COUNTRIES OF EUROPE. These mobs will rush delightedly to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles, and whose property they will then be able to loot.
14 Remember the French Revolution, to which it was we [the Philadelphes (ie.e French branch of the Illuminati)]who gave the name of “Great”.
15.15. Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should turn also from us in favor of that KING-DESPOT OF THE BLOOD OF ZION, WHOM WE ARE PREPARING FOR THE WORLD.
….Thanks to this state of things, the people are destroying every kind of stability and creating disorders at every step.
21. These beasts, it is true, fall asleep again every time when they have drunk their fill of blood, and at such time can easily be riveted into their chains. But if they be not given blood they will not sleep and continue to struggle.
(Authored By Rockefeller, Rothschild, Warburg, Schiff i.a. acc. to Rabbi Marvin Antelman, To Eliminate the Opiate I – Introduction p. xviii).
Unfortunately, the link to Rabbi Antelman seems to disappear from the net every time I link. The above link is active on 8 Febr. 2017. So I have copied what Antelman discussing the Protocols of the Wise Elders of Zion writes on p. xviii in his Introduction –
FOR THIS IS CRUCIAL FOR UNDERSTANDING THE NWO (NEW WORLD ORDER:
I have so often written about Rothschild George Soros and his many revolutionary efforts worldwide. Now people are awakening and in millions demonstrating against him in Eastern Europe. Putin has banned him from Russia.
Occupy Oakland is another Soros funded “Occupy” group – like Occupy Wall Street and here etc.
In Germany, 92% of leftist are living at home with their mummy – my guess: Mum is a Marxist feminist!!!
Not only Soros pays rioters. The German Social Democratic Party pays Socialist Troublemakers for organized riots at any time.
The Daily Caller 6 Febr. 2017: Leaders of anti-Trump “resistance” efforts want to make America “ungovernable” for the president of the United States.
These protesters say they will do whatever it takes to keep Trump from enacting his agenda, and many of them have shown a willingness to destroy public property, assault law enforcement officers and inflict violence upon their fellow citizens.
Inauguration Day provided a hint of what to expect from the far left during Trump’s presidency: well-organized protests that feature alarmist rhetoric and have a proclivity to devolve into anarchic violence. Rioters smashed storefront windows, assaulted innocent bystanders and torched a limo all in the name of opposing Trump.
D.C.’s inauguration weekend violence was believed to be mostly the work of a group calling themselves DisruptJ20, a George Soros funded group which began planning to disrupt the inauguration and destroy property weeks in advance
“We don’t ask permission or put our faith in electoral politics, instead, we use our bodies to stop the smooth operation of the system we oppose,”
“As we resist, we will create new governing institutions, new economic relationships, and new ways of being human,” the pledge reads
“I have described Trump as an impostor and con man, and a would be dictator” and said that “I’m personally convinced he’s going to fail” because the “the policies that guide him are inherently self-contradictory.”
A Soros-paid insider, Rosa Brooks, went on to outline four ways to remove President Trump from office, including impeachment, declaring him mentally unfit for office, or b having the military overthrown him in a coup. Guess the 4. method!
And Communist China is on board: It is buying Hollywood and is about to produce a Michael Bay movie called mockingly “Little America” focussing on how Americans are moving to China after the Trump-like President bankrupted their home country. Bay also produced 2016’s “The Purge: Election Year,” a horror movie that featured an evil president that some saw as an allusion to Trump. This poropaganda alongside Soros´/Rothschild´s “financial Armageddon” are to Take Trump down
The following is a masterpiece of rewriting factual history into his hypocritical and embellishing lies whereby he he does not mention the real devils behind the arising chaos: Himself and his Master in the London City.
Hier follow excerpts of Soros´ history rewriting of his NWO – an apparently very bitter piece which bodes no good for the future.
Project Syndicate 28 Dec. 2016 –
Interim Balance, Soros´own blog:
I am an 86-year-old Hungarian Jew who became a US citizen after the end of World War II. I learned at an early age how important it is what kind of political regime prevails. The formative experience of my life was the occupation of Hungary by Hitler’s Germany in 1944. I probably would have perished had my father not understood the gravity of the situation. He arranged false identities for his family and for many other Jews; with his help, most survived.
Soros says the days of sending fellow Jews into concentration camps and stealing their property were the best part of his life.
In 1947, I escaped from Hungary, by then under Communist rule, to England. As a student at the London School of Economics, I came under the influence of the philosopher Karl Popper, and I developed my own philosophy, built on the twin pillars of fallibility and reflexivity.
Karl Popper was a Jewish Marxist Philosopher, emigrating from Vienna to the UK.
I.a. he wrote the book “The Open Society and Its Enemies” (1945). It was inspired by his reflection on the events of his time and represented a reaction to the prevalent totalitarian ideologies that then dominated Central European politics. His books defended democratic liberalism as a social and political philosophy. They also represented extensive critiques of the philosophical presuppositions underpinning all forms of totalitarianism
I distinguished between two kinds of political regimes: those in which people elected their leaders, who were then supposed to look after the interests of the electorate, and others where the rulers sought to manipulate their subjects to serve the rulers’ interests. Under Popper’s influence, I called the first kind of society open, the second, closed.
I became an active promoter of the former and opponent of the latter.
I find the current moment in history very painful. Open societies are in crisis, and various forms of closed societies – from fascist dictatorships to mafia states – are on the rise. How could this happen? The only explanation I can find is that elected leaders failed to meet voters’ legitimate expectations and aspirations and that this failure led electorates to become disenchanted with the prevailing versions of democracy and capitalism. Quite simply, many people felt that the elites had stolen their democracy.
“The problem for Soros, his associates, media and NGO’s affiliates is that he is bleeding money and his global empire is crumbling like a castle made of sand.
The globalist network of Soros and associates is still alive, but it is in the process of getting dismantled since the defeat of one of George Soros’ pawn in the US election.” (Sputnik 3 Febr. 2017)
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US emerged as the sole remaining superpower, equally committed to the principles of democracy and free markets. The major development since then has been the globalization of financial markets, spearheaded by advocates who argued that globalization increases total wealth.
The argument was misleading, because it ignored the fact that the winners seldom, if ever, compensate the losers. But the potential winners spent enough money promoting the argument that it prevailed. It was a victory for believers in untrammeled free enterprise, or “market fundamentalists,” as I call them.
Because financial capital is an indispensable ingredient of economic development, and few countries in the developing world could generate enough capital on their own, globalization spread like wildfire. Financial capital could move around freely and avoid taxation and regulation.
Globalization has had far-reaching economic and political consequences. It has brought about some economic convergence between poor and rich countries; but it increased inequality within both poor and rich countries. In the developed world, the benefits accrued mainly to large owners of financial capital, who constitute less than 1% of the population. The lack of redistributive policies is the main source of the dissatisfaction that democracy’s opponents have exploited.
I was an avid supporter of the European Union from its inception. I regarded it as the embodiment of the idea of an open society: an association of democratic states willing to sacrifice part of their sovereignty for the common good. It started out at as a bold experiment in what Popper called “piecemeal social engineering.” The leaders set an attainable objective and a fixed timeline and mobilized the political will needed to meet it, knowing full well that each step would necessitate a further step forward. That is how the European Coal and Steel Community developed into the EU.
But then something went woefully wrong. After the Crash of 2008, a voluntary association of equals was transformed into a relationship between creditors and debtors, where the debtors had difficulties in meeting their obligations and the creditors set the conditions the debtors had to obey. That relationship has been neither voluntary nor equal.
Comment: This crash was fully caused by London City´s greedy Wall Street daughters JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs´ and its prolonged arm in the US Treasury, former Goldman CEO, US Treasurer Henry Paulson and his Bail-out Nazi methods, threatening martial law – unless Congress sent 700 bn taxpayer dollars to the Rothschild banks that had burnt their fingers on their subprime mortgage derivatives (video). Goldman Sachs is Jacob Rothschild´s special business bank – “doing God´s work”!
Germany emerged as the hegemonic power in Europe, but it failed to live up to the obligations that successful hegemons must fulfill, namely looking beyond their narrow self-interest to the interests of the people who depend on them. Compare the behavior of the US after WWII with Germany’s behavior after the Crash of 2008: the US launched the Marshall Plan, which led to the development of the EU; Germany imposed an austerity program that served its narrow self-interest.
Reuniting Germany on a 1:1 basis turned out to be very expensive. When Lehman Brothers collapsed, Germany did not feel rich enough to take on any additional obligations. When European finance ministers declared that no other systemically important financial institution would be allowed to fail, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, correctly reading the wishes of her electorate, declared that each member state should look after its own institutions. That was the start of a process of disintegration.
The rise of anti-EU movements further impeded the functioning of institutions. And these forces of disintegration received a powerful boost in 2016, first from Brexit, then from the election of Trump in the US, and on December 4 from Italian voters’ rejection, by a wide margin, of constitutional reforms.
Democracy is now in crisis. Even the US, the world’s leading democracy (???) , elected a con artist and would-be dictator as its president. Although Trump has toned down his rhetoric since he was elected, he has changed neither his behavior nor his advisers. His cabinet comprises incompetent extremists and retired generals.
What lies ahead?
I am confident that democracy (in NWO-language as in the Soviet Union) will prove resilient in the US. Its Constitution (i.e. the false 1871 Rothschild Constitution for Washington DC – which has pushed the original 1776-Constitution aside) and institutions, including the fourth estate (i.e. Rothschild´s corporative media), are strong enough to resist the excesses of the executive branch, thus preventing a would-be dictator from becoming an actual one.
But the US will be preoccupied with internal struggles in the near future, and targeted minorities will suffer. The US will be unable to protect and promote democracy in the rest of the world. On the contrary, Trump will have greater affinity with dictators.
Soros says it was not at all difficult to send fellow Jews to concentration camps. And he sees Trump as a potential dictator and danger to his New World Order
Trump will prefer making deals to defending principles. Unfortunately, that will be popular with his core constituency.
I am particularly worried about the fate of the EU, which is in danger of coming under the influence of Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose concept of government is irreconcilable with that of open society. Putin is not a passive beneficiary of recent developments; he worked hard to bring them about. He recognized his regime’s weakness: it can exploit natural resources but cannot generate economic growth (Due to his FED-dependent central bank). He felt threatened by “color revolutions” in Georgia, Ukraine, and elsewhere. At first, he tried to control social media. Then, in a brilliant move, he exploited social media companies’ business model to spread misinformation and fake news, disorienting electorates and destabilizing democracies. That is how he helped Trump get elected.
Comment: Such undocumented postulates are not only disinformation. They are primitive propaganda, although I do admit that KGB/FSB agent Mason Putin is a dangerous man – for he is Soros/Rothschild´s antithesis.
The same is likely to happen in the European election season in 2017 in the Netherlands, Germany, and Italy. In France, the two leading contenders are close to Putin and eager to appease him. If either wins, Putin’s dominance of Europe will become a fait accompli.
I hope that Europe’s leaders and citizens alike will realize that this endangers their way of life and the values on which the EU was founded. The trouble is that the method Putin has used to destabilize democracy cannot be used to restore respect for facts and a balanced view of reality.
With economic growth lagging and the refugee crisis out of control (due to Soros and here and here), the EU is on the verge of breakdown and is set to undergo an experience similar to that of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. Those who believe that the EU needs to be saved in order to be reinvented must do whatever they can to bring about a better outcome.
Do not let yourself be fooled by this sly fox. He and his master in the London City never planned a peaceful NWO take over. He continues instigating Marxist riots worldwide, creating chaos, coup d´etats and civil wars – while leaving the coming international war to Putin and Trump.