Putin under Heavy Pressure to Prepare for War with a NATO Pushing for War with Russia

General Sir Richard Shirreff, who served as NATO’s Deputy Supreme Allied Commander in Europe between 2011 and 2014, has written a book 2017 War with Russia.
in which he predicts a Russian Attack on the Baltic States (The Independent 18 May 2016).
These superlodge Masons will know


As I recently wrote, NATO is making massive preparations for war on Russia – in accordance with Brzezinski´s Grand Chessboard plan to encircle and make Russia fall apart.

However, a similar move towards war on NATO is now putting Putin under pressure. Do you remember Putin´s disappearance when a struggle for power in the Kremlin was suspected?

In The Nation 4 May 2016, Stephen Cohen,  professor emeritus of Russian studies at New York University and Princeton University wrote:
Washington and its compliant media are condemning the Syrian-Russian military campaign against “moderate” anti-Assad fighters , many of them also jihadists, in Syria around Aleppo.


Regarding the confrontation over Ukraine, the best hope for ending that civil and proxy war, the Minsk Accords, was virtually sabotaged at the UN, where US Ambassador Samantha Power claimed the accords require Russia returning Crimea to Ukraine. (In fact, Crimea is not mentioned in the Minsk agreement.)

And in Europe, where opinion mounts favoring an end to the economic sanctions against Russia—as evidenced by the Dutch referendum against admitting Ukraine to the European Union and the French Parliament’s vote in favor of ending the sanctions—the Obama administration (not only Ambassador Power but President Obama himself) is lobbying hard against such a step when the issue comes up for a vote this summer.

Meanwhile, US-led NATO continues to increase its land, sea, and air military build-up on or near Russia’s borders. Not surprisingly, Cohen argues, Moscow responds by sending its planes to inspect a US warship sailing not far from Russia’s military-naval base at Kaliningrad. Preposterously, having for two decades steadily moved its military presence from Berlin to Russia’s borders, and now escalating it, Washington and Brussels accuse Moscow of “provocations against NATO.” Who, Cohen asks, is “provoking” (“aggressing” against) whom?
Such NATO moves, he adds, can only stir in Russian minds memories of the German invasion in 1941, the last time such hostile military forces mobilized on the country’s frontier.

putin-militaristFinally, Cohen reports, an influential faction in Kremlin politics has long insisted, behind closed doors, that the US-led West is preparing an actual hot war against Russia, and that Putin has not prepared the country adequately at home or abroad. During the past two weeks, this struggle over policy has erupted in public with three prominent members of the Russian elite charging, sometimes implicitly but also explicitly, that Putin has supported his “fifth column” government headed by Prime Minister Dmitrii Medvedev. They are not seeking to remove Putin; there is no alternative to him and his public approval ratings, exceeding 80 percent, are too high. But they do want Medvedev´s government replaced and their own policies adopted. Those policies include a Soviet-style mobilization of the economy for war, and more proactive military policies abroad, especially in Ukraine. Cohen wonders whether US and NATO policymakers are sleepwalking toward war with Russia or whether they actively seek it.

The Huffington Post 17 May 2016 has some alarming remarks to this interview under the title: Putin Is Being Pushed to Abandon His Conciliatory Approach to the West and Prepare for War:
Is the die cast? Is Putin bound to fail? Is conflict inevitable? Ostensibly, it may seem so. The stage is certainly being set.

wolfowitzI have written before on, “the pivot already under way from within the U.S. defense and intelligence arms of Obama’s own administration” toward what is often referred to as the “Paul Wolfowitz doctrine,” a set of policies developed by the U.S. in the 1990s and early 2000s. The author of one of those policies, the 1992 U.S. Defense Planning Guidance, wrote that the DPG in essence sought to:
preclude the emergence of bipolarity, another global rivalry like the Cold War, or multipolarity, a world of many great powers, as existed before the two world wars. To do so, the key was to prevent a hostile power from dominating a ‘critical region,’ defined as having the resources, industrial capabilities and population that, if controlled by a hostile power, would pose a global challenge.

Why did the old warmonger criminal, Jewish  Henry Kissinger suddenly visit his very good friend, King of Jews and Illuminati Antichrist Putin on 3 Jan. 2016?  

In an interview with Vox, U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter was clear that this was broadly the bearing by which the Pentagon was being directed to sail. Then again, there is the rather obvious fact that, instead of the much-touted U.S. military pivot ostensibly being to Asia, the actual NATO pivot is being directed to Central Europe to Russia’s borders. And NATO is plainly pushing the envelope as hard as it dares, up and against Russia’s borders.

Putin is being pushed to wield the knife — and to cut deeply.

Putin carries, at one end of his balancing pole, the various elites more oriented toward the West and the “Washington Consensus“ and, at the pole’s other end, those concerned that Russia faces both a real military threat from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and a hybrid geo-financial war as well.

He is being pressed to come down on the side of the latter, and to pry the grip of the former from the levers of economic power that they still tightly hold.
The issue is whether Russia is sufficiently prepared for further Western efforts to ensure it does not impede or rival American hegemony. Can Russia sustain a geo-financial assault, if one were to be launched? And is such a threat real or mere Western posturing for other ends?

In an Article, Alexander Bastrykin – Former First Deputy Prosecutor General of Russia, Since January 21, 2011, he is the Head of The Investigative Committee of Russia – does not say that Putin is to blame, though the context makes it clear that this is what he means. But a few days later, Cohen explains, the article sparked further discussion from those who both endorse Bastrykin and do precisely mention Putin by name. Then, Cohen notes, a retired Russian general confirmed that the West is indeed preparing for war — he pointed to NATO deployments in the Baltics, the Black Sea and Poland, — and underlines again the unpreparedness of the Russian military to face this threat. “This is a heavy indictment of Putin,” Cohen says

Then there is the rhetoric: Russian aggression. Russian ambitions to recover the former Soviet Empire. Russian attempts to divide and destroy Europe. And so on.

The Political Insider 24 May 2016 “Trump  says he wants to move on to a new, more substantial relationship, a deeper relationship with Russia, how can we not welcome that?” he said. “Of course we welcome that.” And Putin praises Trump: 


This is the nightmare of the neocons:  that Pres. Trump will find an understanding with Putin. They know their time is short

georgia-guidestones-befor_-new_square_Remember the Georgia Guidestones? “Keep mankind below 500 mio.!”

NATO-RussiaThis is really alarming: Both sides seeking war with each other.

Both sides are puppets who via Masonic
are being directed by the
Rothschild/Jesuit rulers
of  the world towards WWIII by the Albert/William Carr

Right: NATO-Russia military strength comparison.

The Daily Mail 26 Aug. 2015. 



This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Putin under Heavy Pressure to Prepare for War with a NATO Pushing for War with Russia

  1. Michael K. says:

    Hi Anders, Gruß Gott!

    I have ponderd the pairing of Putin and Kissinger, and the pugilistic posturing of both NATO and Russia/CIS, and my view is as follows:

    Both sides are acting threateningly to each other, contrary to any pacifist or defense only claims by Russia. Russian war exercises are simulations of nuclear ground assault against Europe, and NATO intentions are not better towards Russia, for sure. Putin’s administration is skilled at propaganda and has very tight press controls up to keep outsiders from knowing the real score in Russia. The West and NATO, on the other hand, are having their liberal ideals of freedom of speech exploited by paid Russian disinformation artists. It seems doubtful that the King of the Jews is a sit back and let it happen type. He is good at saying “peace, peace,” but there will be no peace with such a man. He has great imperial ambitions for the Eurasian Zionists, and the hasidic types support him fervently.

    One, it seems much more likely to me that both Jewish Zionist and Vatican elements inside the US government are secretly on Putin’s side, than that the reverse is true and Putin’s side is full of fifth columnists. Two, I think that we need to watch the Balkans as a potential flash point for the general war. Especially the issue of Kosovo being made some sort of international city for Muslims right in the heart of Serbian cultural territory. The tensions could reach a boiling point very quickly, and a war there would advance Eurasian Zionist interests if it became a chance to hand NATO’s Turkey a complete defeat. This would give Eurasia much greater strategic depth, if the Zio-Russians got control over access to the Black Sea.

    Just some thoughts, hope you have time to respond, and that you keep up the dedicated work here. God Bless.

  2. Pingback: 3. Weltkrieg. Gorbatschow: “NATO bereitet heissen Krieg vor – den Letzten”. Putin: “Welt in unumkehrbare Richtung gezogen”. Putin´s Test-Sprecher: “Ihr steht vor einem Erstschlag. Ihr werdet alle sterben”! | K U L I S S E N R I S S

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.