The Guardian as Climate Champion against “Mortally Dangerous Warming-Denying Public”: Use All Psychological Tricks to Make Them Renege on “Fake news” (Truth) and Accept NWO Truth (Lie)

The Guardian 27 Decbr. 2017  acknowledges that it is not possible to sell the climate lie to an increasingly sceptic audience.
Very funny, the newspaper concludes that the public is entangled in some kind of psychological blockade: It simply wont believe the inconvenient truth (of Al Gore, whose film with this title was stamped as an inconvenient lie by a British court on 11 issues).

They believe in the proven  lie and here and here and here and here
– not to forget the Climategate I and Climategate II scandals committed by paid liars calling themselves scientists. As the IPCC boss, Rajendra Pachauri, told the Times of India on 3 Sept. 2010: Climate science is just politically commissioned work with the outcome wanted by the politicians paying their salaries.

Thttp://euro-med.dk/bil/cohen.jpghis is not to say that man made global climate change (however not warming) does not exist – for it does through solar radiation management (Chemtrails and here and here and here and here etc. – even intending to make us robots by means of smart dust and Haarp and  here and here e.g., as I have so often described. (See IPCC´s AR5 SPM 21).

But the the core of the matteris man made CO2-global warming. As Rockefeller´s Club of Rome declared in its “First Global Revolution“p. 75, 1991: co-founder Alexander King:In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Smart, isn´t it?

And the Guardian has the cure of the climate denial disease:Technocognition

The Guardian 27 Dec. 2017
“People are very good at finding ways to believe what we want to believe. Climate change is the perfect example.
This has exposed humanity’s potentially fatal flaw. Denying an existential threat threatens our existence.

Partisan polarization over climate change has steadily grown over the past two decades. This change can largely be traced to the increasingly fractured and partisan media environment that has created an echo chamber in which people can wrap themselves in the comfort of “alternative facts” (a.k.a spin and lies) that affirm their worldviews. We’ve become too good at fooling ourselves into believing falsehoods, which has ushered in a dangerous “post-truth” era, with no better example than the subject of climate change.”

How true -and the Guardian itself is entrapped in this ploy as for the non-exixting CO2-Global Warming.

The Guardian has the solution, however:”In its December 2017 issue, the Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition published a paper by Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich Ecker, and John Cook, along with an impressive 9 responses from other social scientists, essentially investigating how we can make truth great again”.

Well, first, we remember that John Cook was the amateur fraudster who launched the lie about 97% consensus among scientists on global warming (peer review stated a consensus of only 0.3%) – quoted by Pres. Obama – who also forced the NOAA to present forged warming figures to the Paris Climate One-World Conference in 2015: The Daily Caller 5 July 2017  reports the global temperatures from the 3 biggest measurement organisations  have manipulated today´s temperatures up (by a factor of 2.0) and previous temperatures down to show “steep global warming”!!

So now we have come to the core of the matter: The NWO truth is what was called lie in the old world order – and lie has been turned into truth by the NWO.
Note: Neither the Guardian nor any other NWO media have produced any proof of their global warming hoax – while climate sceptic scientists have produced plenty of convincing arguments and measurements against the “global warming” scam.

 In the following you can see and hear demagogical Prof. Lewandowsky telling us the truth about Rothschild´s NWO – then calling it “conspiracy theory”, which he also calls climate denial.

Now let´s take a look at  this fraudster, Professor Lewandowsky.
In Wattsupwiththat , highly esteemed Anthony Watt writes:
“Amid complaints about the veracity and ethics of Lewandowsky´s psychological research trying to equate climate skeptics to conspiracy theory nuts and “moon landing deniers”, it seems that Professor Lewandowsky is no longer at the University of Western Australia and has moved to the UK.
I know of at least two, possibly more, professional complaints that are in progress against Lewdandowsy (and his sidekick, Skeptical Science’ s John Cook) at the University of Western Australia for his data fabrication and his questionable science composed of outlandish made-up claims designed to smear climate skeptics worldwide. His most recent skeptic smear paper has been taken down, pending investigation.

To solve this dilemma, Lewandowsky and his colleagues propose what they call “technocognition,” which is described as:

the idea that we should use what we know about psychology to design technology in a way that minimizes the impact of misinformation. By improving how people communicate, they hope, we can improve the quality of the information shared.
1. One key idea involves the establishment of an international non-governmental organization that would create a rating system for disinformation. There are already some similar examples in existence – Climate Feedback consults climate scientists to rate the accuracy of media articles on climate change, and Snopes is a widely-respected fact checker.
Comment: So, the NWO climate liars are to decide what misinformation is – and exclude the truth! – This is already being done in social media according to Angela Merkels demand.

2. The study authors also suggest that inoculation theory techniques could help dislodge misinformation after it first takes hold. This involves explaining the logical fallacy underpinning a myth. People don’t like being tricked, and research has shown that when they learn that an ideologically-friendly article has misinformed them by using fake experts, for example, they’re more likely to reject the misinformation.

In the following video, you can see notorious fraudster John Cook performing in the role of demagoguery: He speaks of vaccinating climate deniers by giving them weak versions of their “wrong ideas” – for then it´s easier to debunk them. Misconceptions cannot be eradicated by preaching the NWO climate “science”. It requires clever “myth” debunking.
In short if you are a climate denier you have to be thoroughly manipulated and brainwashed to neglect the facts

3. The authors note that technocognition faces one additional major obstacle:
This obstacle is the gorilla in the room: Policy making in the United States is largely independent of the public’s wishes but serves the interests of economic elites.
This means it will be difficult to implement policies to shift us away from our current post-fact and post-truth world unless elites or interest groups or policymakers decide it’s in their best interest which it is: Edmund de Rothschild launched the CO2-warming lie and is making a lot of our money through his Global Environmental Facility .

When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

4. The underlying problem we face is that most American votes seem to be decided based on tribalism rather than policy preferences. We can do nothing with the Republicans in power. Once they regain power, Democrats would be wise to implement technocognition-based policies, to try and bring an end to the dangerous post-truth era before we foolishly do too much lasting damage to our planet and ourselves.

Comment
Note that The Guardian writes such a key article based on notorious and proven fraudsters. That´s NWO Truth which stamps honest and real science as “fake news”. But what else can one expect from the world´s media cartell owned by 6 Jewish NWO-Zionist corporations?
 Rothschild´s  NWO  (as correctly stated by fraudster Lewandowsky) is leading you by the nose, manipulatin, brainwashing, deceiving you for its dirty purpose: Pharisee-Zionist ruled Communist one-world and here.

This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.