There are a lot of aggressive, warlike neocons in America who suffer from vicious sinful pride, diabolical self-righteousness and political paranoia. The neocons are willing to drag down and destroy all of humanity in Armageddon because North Korea is a threat to the security of the United States.
The neocons would sacrifice thousands of American troops, inculding Navy personnel, and South Korea and Japan in a quest for victory that would lead to World War III (TRIB LIVE 27 May 2017).
The US is more and more aggressive to Russia – in spite of Pres. Trump´s good will to live in peace with his friend Putin. But the neocons and their masters, the military industrial complex, seem to have kidnapped Trump, enforcing him to wage an aggressive policy against Russia.
Or did Masons Putin and Trump at their meetings at the G20 meeting recently simply agree on the Illuminati game (The Albert Pike-William Carr plan)?
The New York Times 28 July 2017: Russia took its first steps on Friday to retaliate against proposed American sanctions for Moscow’s suspected meddling in the 2016 election, seizing two American diplomatic properties in Russia and ordering the United States Embassy to reduce staff by September.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement, “This yet again attests to the extreme aggressiveness of the United States when it comes to international affairs.”
The Guardian 28 July 2017: The House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted on Tuesday to approve new sanctions on Russia, setting up a potential showdown with the White House. Vladimir Putin has accused US lawmakers of “insolence”, and promised Russia will retaliate if the latest round of US sanctions against Russia are signed into law.
By the way: When I compare the above Pres. Putin with KGB Putin I see clear differences.
Is Putin really Putin – or a double – as purportedly claimed by the real Putin´s wife, Lyudmila (The Daily Star 24 Dec. 2016) after the original Putin was poisoned in 2014
Left: Young KGB Vladimir Putin.
I found significant differences in age stable parameters: Young Putin´s lips are much thicker than those of Pres. Putin. Young Putin has no antitragus in his left ear, while Pres. Putin has a pronounced one. Young has a straight, regular nose, while Pres. Putin has a plump nose with a septum prominating much more downwards than that of KGB Putin and more marked nose wings. Pres. Putin´s eyebrows and upper orbital rim is curved – while that of KGB Putin is nearly horizontal.
Also. the below photos from The daily Star are clearly not of the same Putin.
“We are behaving in a very restrained and patient way, but at some moment we will need to respond,” said Putin at a press conference with his Finnish counterpart, Sauli Niinistö.
“It’s impossible to endlessly tolerate this kind of insolence towards our country,” Putin said, referring to the sanctions. “This practice is unacceptable – it destroys international relations and international law.”
It´s a very dangerous game: Putin is not stupid and has reserved the right of a preemptive strike
Global Res. 27 July 2017: Painting Russia as the Enemy.
Before any war, the state always embarks on an outlandish campaign to demonize the target in the eyes of the people. One logical conclusion to be drawn from the incessant array of anti-Russian propaganda that has been promulgated by the West in recent years, is that it is designed to inculcate in the minds of the western public that Russia is the enemy, in preparation for a future war.
In recent years, the world has become increasingly more unstable. Tensions between Russia and the US have reached a level not seen since the height of the Cold War, with some even arguing that we have surpassed this point by now. The US is continually provoking Russia, as the hawks in Washington cannot stand the fact that Moscow has stood up to the neocons in Syria.
Perhaps the US is trying to intimidate Russia so that it backs down, but this is a very dangerous game to play. How many times can the US poke the Russian bear before the bear responds?
The world stands on the edge of a dangerous precipice, as it slides towards war
Baiting Russia into a Military Response in Syria?
Although the official US narrative was that they were protecting US-backed forces on the ground, one cannot help but question the justification used by a country that has repeatedly lied and deceived in order to launch imperial wars.
There is a very real danger that the decision to shoot down a Syrian jet was designed to provoke Syria to respond militarily to US forces, therefore providing justification for a full-scale invasion of Syria by the US and her allies.
Moreover, and more dangerously, there is a potential that this incident was designed (by rogue elements with the US) to provoke Russia to respond militarily to the US in Syria, providing justification to start a hot war with Russia, and launch a pre-emptive nuclear attack on Russia.
Although this may sound like madness, we should not underestimate how mad the neocons are. The US and Russia have reportedly already come extremely close to a direct confrontation in Syria earlier this year. In April, after the US launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian airfield, Russia was “an inch from confrontation” with the US, according to the Iranian President, Hassan Rouhani.
Any followers of Dr. Paul Craig Roberts work, the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy, who also worked at a variety of US think tanks in Washington, will know that he has repeatedly warned that some belligerent and crazed elements within Washington are actually considering launching a pre-emptive nuclear strike on Russia.
These persons with Jewish names were responsible for the Iraq war.
It is not just Dr. Roberts that is warning of this apocalyptic scenario however. At the end April, the Deputy Head of Operations of the Russian General Staff, Lt. Gen. Viktor Poznikhir, warned of the potential that the US could launch a “sudden nuclear missile strike” against Russia:
“The presence of US missile defense bases in Europe, [and] missile defense vessels in seas and oceans close to Russia, creates a powerful covert strike component for conducting a sudden nuclear missile strike against the Russian Federation.”
Russia Today 27 July 2017: Army Chief Mark Milley: “It’s a very serious situation, and it’s not going in a good direction,” he said.
A ground war in the Korean Peninsula would be “deadly” and “horrific,” the general explained, with some 25 million people in the metropolitan area of Seoul within reach of North Korean conventional artillery and chemical weapons.
“Do I think North Korea’s military would be destroyed? I do,” he said. “But that would be done at a high cost in terms of human life.”
As terrible as war in the Korean Peninsula would be, Milley added, so would be “a nuclear weapon detonating in Los Angeles.”
The Daily Mail 30 July 2017: Donald Trump is poised to order a military strike against North Korea ‘within the next year’ after the communist state said it had successfully fired a ballistic missile capable of hitting the US mainland.
Pentagon officials have laid out plans to obliterate a nuclear weapons facility operating deep within a mountain in the rogue state.