Summary: Today, President Obama has 12 days left in office. He and the US establishment are, however, behaving as if the Obama administration were to continue.
Obama challenges Putin by moving 3600 troops and 87 tanks to the Russian border. He makes the US elections “critical infrastructure,” which is interpreted by Alex Jones as a sign that he will rob Donald Trump of his election. He is strongly opposed to “hate speech” and “fake news” of the alternative media.
But most of all, he is escalating a concoction of fake news with vigorous support from the neoconservatives of his Republican Party: that Russia stole Hillary Clinton ‘s election by having Wikileaks release Clinton’ s highly compromising emails, including classified files that Hillary stored criminally unsafely in her private computer (without password) to conceal criminal behaviour, e.g. the murder of the Benghazi ambassador and corruption.
Although there is no evidence of Russian hacking, Obama and the neocons louder and more martially accuse Russia “of an act of war”. Although he has only got 12 days left, Obama has promised multiple “retaliation” – so far only sanctions.
Two reports from the US secret services FBI, CIA, NSA and the Department of Homeland Security have just been issued. FBI boss Comey has been persuaded by CIA boss Brennan, saying the Russians have hacked – although he first said there was no proof.
By all propaganda tirades, the Americans interfere a lot more in Russia with the White Revolution against Putin than the Russians do in America.
Since this is an ominous situation, which contains 2 dangerous options: 1) war with Russia or 2) annihilation of the election of Trump as president / coup d´état I have tried to find out whether there is evidence of Russian hacking.
I have found the following: In the unofficial report, the intelligence services pound on 4 “proofs”. The well-known anti-malware producer, John McAfee, will know that it is about the following: 1) Russian language and 2) Cyrillic alphabet found in the malware. 3) Time stamp and 4) IP address pointing to Russia.
On the other hand, in the Ukraine, Russian is also spoken and the Cyrillic alphabet is being used.
What amateur hacker would probably leave such fingerprints? They seem deliberately left behind if true.
This is important – because the malware is said to be the same as the one used against the cellphones of the Ukrainian artillery 1 1/2 years ago – acc. to the chief of CrowdStrike, Dmitri Alperovitch. This was, however, massively debunked.
Why, however, Alperovich? The DNC refused to allow the FBI access to their servers – the only way to find the alleged hacker. So, the FBI turned to the fanatically Anti-Russian Ukrainian, Alperovich, a “Fellow” of the Atlantic Council. This council is financed by: The US State Dept., NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress and the Ukrainian Jewish oligarch Victor Pinchuk.
They are today´s warmongers!
Now let us turn to the two official intelligence reports: Without any factual evidence, they claim that Russia hacked the e-mails of Hillary’s election campaign and the DNC to increase Trump´s chances – and reduce those of Hillary!
Their actions remind of a gossip party. E.g.: The Russian government news outlet RT showed sympathy for Trump, and the Russians celebrated Trump´s victory. So Putin must have hacked! And: The Sovjet Union had spies in the US – a Russian spy was even snatched in 2010 – so Putin must have hacked !! And: Putin has had many positive experiences with Western political leaders whose business interests made them more inclined to deal with Russia. So Putin must have hacked!
I have made a detailed extract from these two reports.
So: Now assess for yourself whether this is justifying the 3rd World War which very strong forces absolutely want – or a coup d´état in the USA to prevent evil Trump from coming into power.
Latest: TRUMP ACCEPTS THESE EMPTY REPORTS – AND “MAY TAKE ACTION”!!
He must have been forced to this step as he has declined the conclusion until today!!!
We have seen the same change of mind in the case of Trump´s true claim that Obama was born in Kenya – and thus an illegitimate US president: Suddenly he admitted that Obama was born in the USA!! And suddenly he admitted man-made global climate change, which he had previously denied. His Master´s Voice has spoken!
Russian government outlet Sputnik 8 Jan. 2017
Ashton Carter Sputnik 8. Jan. 2017; US secr. of defence
The NWO elite is desperate after Hillary´s defeat to Trump. On 6 Jan, Congress approved of Trump´s election. One may wonder why all of a sudden, in a midnight initiative, Obama lets his Dept. of Homeland Security declare state elections a “critical infrastructure” to enjoy state protection. And one may wonder why he is now sending 3600 troops and 87 tanks to the Russian border – to be deployed by 20 Jan.! What did Obama mean by saying on December 29th that he had “ordered a series of retaliatory steps against Russia” – which we have not yet seen, apart from more sanctions? Why does he not leave this problem to his successor? This Nobel Prize winner dropped 26.171 bombs in 2016 in his 4 wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya).
Suddenly during the US presidential Election campaigns, Obama and Hillary Clinton began to blame Putin for releasing Hillary Clinton´s Emails, incl. classified mails, through Wikileaks – after Russia was claimed to have hacked Hillary´s mails. Hillary had pushed all security precautions aside: She kept tens of thousands of secret, even classified, mails in her private computer – even without password!
When Hillary lost the election she flew into a rage – blaming anybody but herself, and especially Putin, for her defeat. And Obama supported this unfounded allegation.
Very influential Neocon John McCain Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee also talks about about “Russian hacking” as a fact and an “act of war” although the Gome Security Dept. refuses it.
Obama has expelled 35 Russian diplomats on this accusation – but lost face, as Putin did no retaliate.
Then something odd happened: First the FBI said it could not find any evidence of hacking while CIA Boss Brennan postulated hacking. All of a sudden, swaying FBI reed James Comey was persuaded by Brennan to think otherwise.
But this is much more serious than we may perceive: The war hawks of the USA want war now – and are using this “hacking” incident as an excuse.
Zero Hedge 5 Jan. 2017: Very powerful interests have already decided they want this war.Right at this very moment, we are being sold on this war by the med
ia, politicians, intelligence agencies.
We need to understand that those who want this war will be absolutely relentless. The sales pitch will not end until they get exactly what they want.
ONLY: THE FBI DID NOT EXAMINE THE SERVERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE BEFORE ISSUING THE REPORT STATING RUSSIAN HACKING!! THE WHOLE THING IS A SCAM!!
Buzz Feed 5 Jan. 2017 The FBI did not examine the servers of the Democratic National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyber intrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.
It’s unclear why the FBI didn’t request access to the DNC servers.
The Daily Mail 14 Dec. 2016: Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and associate of Julian Assange, told the Dailymail.com he had a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources. The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks’.
CNN 6 Jan. 2017: THE DNC REBUFFED FBI REQUEST TO EXAMINE ITS SERVERS – WHEREUPON THE FBI CONSULTED AN ATLANTIC COUNCIL GROUP NAMED CROWDSTRIKE.
This is a very Antirussian group of cyber experts – who had claimed that the DNC e-mails were hacked with the same Russian malware that was used to hack Ukrainian Artillery cellphones. This has been debunked. The Atlantic Council is funded in part by the US State Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress, and the Ukrainian Jewish oligarch Victor Pinchuk.
Veterans Today 6 January hat den Software/ Antimalware-Produzenten John McAfee befragt: “Darin gibt es vier Tatsachen, die sie als Beweis behaupten, dass Russland dieses Hacken unternähme.Es ist Quatsch. Die Informationen seien 1) russische Sprache wurde in der Malware gefunden 3) Kyrillische Tastatur wurde verwendet. Die forensische Wissenschaft kann nun sagen, welche Art von Tastatur verwendet wurde, um ein Stück einer Malware zu entwickeln “, sagte McAfee RT.
“3) Die Zeitstempel waren in einer Zeitzone der Geschäftszeiten von Moskau und St. Petersburg und anderen Orten in Russland und 4) die IP-Adresse zeigte auf eine russische Adresse hin.” McAfee erklärt, warum dies kein Beweis sei.
has consulted Software/antimalware producer John McAfee: “In there are four facts which they claim prove that Russia did this hack. It was utter nonsense. The information was 1) Russian language was found in the malware. 2) a Cyrillic keyboard was used. The forensic science can now tell what type of keyboard was used to develop a piece of a malware,” McAfee told RT.
“3) The time stamps were in a time zone for the business hours of Moscow and St. Petersburg and other places in Russia and 4)the IP address pointed to a Russian address.” McAfee explains why this is no proof.
Now the FBI and the Homeland Security Dept. have issued a
Report to show How a ” Russian Act of War” was perpetrated.
The report from 29 Dec. 2016 states: This Joint Analysis Report (JAR) is the result of analytic efforts between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This document provides technical details regarding the tools and infrastructure used by the Russian civilian and military intelligence Services (RIS) to compromise and exploit networks and endpoints associated with the U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. Government, political, and private sector entities.
The U.S. Government is referring to this malicious cyber activity by Russian Intelligence Services (RIS) as GRIZZLY STEPPE .
Two spearphishing campaigns named APT 28 amd APT 29 were “likely associated with RIS”
Public attribution of these activities to RIS is supported by technical indicators from
the U.S. Intelligence Community, DHS, FBI, the private sector, and other entities. This determination expands upon the Joint Statement released October 7, 2016*, from the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security.
*In this statement was written:The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts.
The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion.
This activity by RIS is part of an ongoing campaign of cyber -enabled operations directed at the U.S. government and its citizens
These cyber operations have included spearphishing campaigns targeting government organizations, critical infrastructure entities, think tanks, universities, political organizations, and corporations leading to the theft of information. In foreign countries, RIS actors conducted damaging and/or disruptive cyber-attacks, including
attacks on critical infrastructure networks.
The remainder is just a textbook of how hacking can take place and advise to avoid it
But another Report was issued on 6 Jan. 2o17 “ASSESSING RUSSIAN ACTIVITIES AND ITENSIONS IN RECENT US ELECTIONS”.
It says: The Intelligence Community rarely can publicly reveal the full extent of its knowledge or the precise bases for its assessments.
This Report states every important thing: “Every kind of cyber operation malicious or not leaves a track.
Otherwise, the report does not bring one single proof that Russia hacked the DNC or governmental files. Se my excerpts in the ADDENDUM.
Every section begins with “We asses” or “we estimate“. The conclusions are absurd and childish: It reminds of stuff from a gossip magazine – it goes like: The Soviet Union had spies in the US – and we did snatch a Russian spy in 2010 – so Putin must have spies in the US today (As though the US had no spies in Russia, where the NED and Freedom House as well as Soros´”Open Society“are deeply involved in the “White Revolution” and here against Putin – are even the cause.
“We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency”. “Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations”.
*However, DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.
More of this kind of “proofs”:
*We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.
* Putin publicly pointed to the Panama Papers disclosure and the Olympic doping scandal – suggesting he sought to use disclosures to discredit the image of the United States.
* Putin has had many positive experiences working with Western political leaders whose business interests made them more disposed to deal with Russia.
* In July 2015, Russian intelligence gained access to Democratic National Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that access until at least June 2016.
* We assess that the GRU operations resulted in the compromise of the personal email accounts of Democratic Party officials and political figures.
* Moscow most likely chose WikiLeaks because of its self proclaimed reputation for authenticity.
* The Kremlin’s principal international propaganda outlet RT (formerly Russia Today) has actively collaborated with WikiLeaks. RT’s editor in chief visited WikiLeaks founder Julian
Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in August 2013 – and speaks nicely about Julian Assange – who says he has not got the e-mails from Russia.
* Kremlin proxy Vladimir Zhirinovskiy proclaimed that if President elect Trump won, Russia would “drink champagne” in anticipation of being able to advance its positions on Syria and Ukraine.
* Russia used trolls as well as RT as part of its influence efforts to denigrate Secretary Clinton.
* Putin’s public views of the disclosures suggest the Kremlin and the intelligence services will continue to consider using cyber enabled disclosure operations.
* Russia has sought to influence elections across Europe.
* We assess Russian intelligence services will continue to develop capabilities to provide Putin with options to use against the United States
Now assess for yourself if these “proofs” are sufficient reason for WW3 – or rather for Obama federalizing the election – overturning Trump´s election before 20 Jan.
This Report is a collaboration between the CIA, the FBI and the NSA.This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment.
Some of our judgments about Kremlin preferences and intent are drawn from the behavior of Kremlin loyal political figures, state media, and pro Kremlin social media actors, all of whom the Kremlin either directly uses to convey messages or who are answerable to the Kremlin.
The declassified report does not and cannot include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence and
sources and methods. Every kind of cyber operation malicious or not leaves a trail.
This Report is a collaboration between the CIA, the FBI and the NSA.This report is a d
eclassified version of a highly classified assessment.
We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electabi
lity and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President elect Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments
We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.
All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment NSA has moderate confidence.
Further information increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and goals..
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations such as cyber activity with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, state funded media, third party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.
Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties. Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards. DHS assesses that the types of systems.
Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.
In trying to influence the US election, we assess the Kremlin sought to advance its longstanding desire to undermine the US led liberal
democratic order, the promotion of which Putin and other senior Russian leaders view as a threat to Russia and Putin’s regime.
Putin publicly pointed to the Panama Papers disclosure and the Olympic doping scandal as US directed efforts to defame Russia, suggesting he sought to use disclosures to
discredit the image of the United States and cast it as hypocritical.
Putin most likely wanted to discredit Secretary Clinton because he has publicly blamed her since 2011 for inciting mass protests against his regime in late 2011 and early 2012
, and because he holds a grudge for comments he almost certainly saw as disparaging him.
Beginning in June, Putin’s public comments about the US presidential race avoided directly praising President-elect Trump, probably because Kremlin officials thought that any praise from Putin personally would backfire in the
United States. Nonetheless, Putin publicly indicated a preference for Presidentelect Trump’s stated policy to work with Russia, and pro Kremlin figures spoke highly about what they saw as his Russia friendly positions on Syria and Ukraine. Putin publicly contrasted the Presidentelect’s approach to Russia with Secretary Clinton’s “aggressive rhetoric
Putin has had many positive experiences working with Western political leaders whose business interests made them more disposed to deal with Russia, such as former Italian
Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder.
Before the election, Russian diplomats had publicly denounced the US electoral process and were prepared to publicly call into question the validity of the results.
By their nature, Russian influence campaigns are multifaceted and designed to be deniable because they use a mix of agents of influence, cutouts, front organizations, and false
In July 2015, Russian intelligence gained access to Democratic National Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that access until at least June 2016. The General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) probably began cyber operations aimed at the US election by March 2016.
We assess that the GRU operations resulted in the compromise of the personal email accounts of Democratic Party officials and political figures. By May, the GRU had exfiltrated large volumes of data from the DNC.
We assess with high confidence that the GRU used the Guccifer 2.0 persona,DCLeaks.com, and WikiLeaks to release US victim data.
We assess with high confidence that the GRU relayed material it acquired from the DNC and senior Democratic officials to WikiLeaks. Moscow most likely chose WikiLeaks because of its self proclaimed reputation for authenticity.
The Kremlin’s principal international propaganda outlet RT (formerly Russia Today) has actively collaborated with WikiLeaks. RT’s editor in chief visited WikiLeaks founder Julian
Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in August 2013, where they discussed renewing his broadcast contract with RT,
In early September, Putin said publicly it was important the DNC data was exposed to WikiLeaks, calling the search for the source of the leaks a distractionand denying Russian “state involvement” level” involvement.
These election related disclosures reflect a pattern of Russian intelligence using hacked information in targeted influence efforts against targets such as Olympic athletes and other foreign governments.
State-owned Russian media made increasingly favorable comments about President elect Trump as the 2016 US general and primary election campaigns progressed while consistently offering negative coverage of Secretary Clinton.
Kremlin proxy Vladimir Zhirinovskiy, leader of the nationalist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, proclaimed just before the election that if President elect Trump won, Russia would “drink champagne” in anticipation of being able to advance its positions on Syria and Ukraine. RT’s coverage of Secretary Clinton throughout the
US presidential campaign was consistently negative.
Russia used trolls as well as RT as part of its influence efforts to denigrate Secretary Clinton. This effort amplified stories on scandals about Secretary Clinton and the role of WikiLeaks in the election campaign.
During the Cold War, the Soviet Union used intelligence officers, influence agents, forgeries, and press placements to disparage candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin, according to a former KGB archivist.
The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR)Directorate S (Illegals) officers arrested in the United Statesin 2010 reported to Moscow about the 2008 election.
Putin’s public views of the disclosures suggest the Kremlin and the intelligence services will continue to consider using cyber enabled disclosure operations because of their belief
that these can accomplish Russian goals relatively easily without significant damage to Russian interests.
Russia has sought to influence elections across Europe.
We assess Russian intelligence services will continue to develop capabilities to provide Putin with options to use against the United States