Super-secretivity on Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Tactically Leaked. Was This the End of the NWO-EU Mega-Treason?

The German governmental party, the wants to sue Greenpeace for “whistleblowing”  TTIP secrecy: “Against law violations by Greenpeace in the ongoing action, the rule of law must be defended by all means.” (DWN 7 Mai 2016) – that is, the dupe sues those who prevented the fraud! For the German government is just an NGO of the US overnment, an NGO of the Council on Foreign relations. This attitude is, of course, that of a vassal.

*

suspicion-TTIPGreenpeace has published secret TTIP negotiation documents
Greenpeace 2 May 2016:  “The leaked documents also show the influence of industry lobbies on trade negotiators. The leak mentions several times that negotiators regularly consult with industry and are prepared to represent their positions.”
“Malmström may well promise not to undermine environmental and consumer protection, but the evidence tells a different story. In several areas the US proposes to lower EU standards, but there are no EU proposals in the leaked consolidated documents to counter this.”
Download disclosed documents 

ITTIP-TTP-TISA have previously exhaustively described the TTIP  here and here and here and here. EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström has even arrogantly said:  “I do not take my (TTIP) mandate from the people of Europe” – she sees us not as peoples but as a contemptible mass! Certainly, the companies want to pocket, govern and loot us. But why is the United States now pushing so hard on the time factor. Why does the TTIP have to be a reality already  this year ?

Here is the answer:
DWN 7. Mai 2016:  Apparently the Americans know that serious problems with the EU countries could arise within the immediate future. The reason is the debt crisis. In recent years, US banks have palmed  large-scale financial products on European local authorities and companies  – pointing out that there was no need to carefully read the fine print. Now the rude awakening comes in many places.

Therefore, there has been a veritable wave of lawsuits. With the  TTIP, it   would be possible for US banks to circumvent the ordinary nation-state legal procedures.

The Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership (TTP) seems to be given thing. The TTIP seemed to be, too – until a tactical leak had the supersecretivtity burst that did not even allow members of Parliaments to know what really happened behind closed doors.

What is the problem with the TTIP?

TTIP-AFP-GettyActivist Post 26 April 2016. The Tribunal:  Composed of just three corporate lawyers, the three will be divided into: one with experience with the defendant’s issues, one for the plaintiff corporation, and a third who is, somehow, neutral. The TTP-Tribunal (The same with TTIP) will meet in closed session.
The tribunal now rules against your state’s cigarette tax, e.eg. The tax is ordered to be repealed for effecting a “technical barrier to trade .
The Tribunal then issues an order for compensation of, hypothetically, one hundred million dollars, due to the loss of profits to R.J. Reynolds tobacco sales. Your state’s attorney general  heads for the Appeals court, perhaps the Supreme Court.
Here lies the true treason of TPP (TTIP). It grants, once Congress ratifies it, the complete nullification of the jurisdiction of all US courts regarding matters before the tribunal. So your state loses. Automatically. And the taxpayer will pay. 

The New American 23 March 20016:  The relevant section of the agreement would force the EU to consult the U.S. government before adopting “legislative” or regulatory proposals. It would also commit U.S. authorities to consulting with Brussels before moving forward on legislation or regulatory schemes across a wide array of subject areas.

The Chevron-Ecuador case is a deterrent eye-opener.

fuck-ttip.jpg_1718483346Bertelsmann Stiftung 21 April 2016:  Only 17 percent of Germans and 18 percent of Americans believe TTIP is a good thing. Two years ago, the figures were 55 percent and 53 percent respectively.

Greenpeace´s TTIP Leak
DW 2 May:   The Netherlands chapter of environmental organization Greenpeace on today released “half of the draft text” of the controversial Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement that has been shrouded in secrecy during the closed-door talks to hammer out terms.
Greenpeace highlighted a controversial provision in the deal that would allow companies to intervene in decision-making processes, and even sue a country over regulations.

It is unacceptable to give private companies special legal rights that bypass established court systems and fly in the face of democratic sovereignty. 
From Berlin to London, the trade deal has encountered resistance in the EU.
German Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel, who also serves as deputy chancellor, said the trade deal would “fail” if Washington did not offer concessions.”The Americans want to hold on to their ‘Buy American’ idea. We can’t accept that. They don’t want to open their public tenders to European companies. See Activist Post 2 May 2016, too.

ttip-trojan-horseThe Telesur News 24 April 2016:  The mysterious TTIP is nothing more than U.S. imperialism at its worst since the trade agreements are intended to be a privilege of the multinational societies.

The Independent 2 May 2014: “T
he TTIP negotiations will never survive this leak
,” said John Hilary, the executive director of War on Want.

The Independent 4 May 2016: TTIP negotiations will probably stop

DWN 2 mai 2016: A   Greenpeace analysis shows that the  TTIP environmental and consumer standards can also be nullified retrospectively

TTIP-Hamburg-1024x683Thus, the pig came out of the poke. The question is: How and why just now as the 13th and decisive TTIP meeting was to take place  (EUObserver 25 April 2016– and a large signature collection (more than  3 Mio.!) as well as large demonstrations in Germany against the TTIP have just taken place? Was this a planned EU pretext to stop this madness?

Who benefits from the leak?
Clearly the citizens of the EU, who is, according to the leaked papers under colossal pressure from the US. Indeed, the US has blackmailed the EU: “If you do not take our unlabelled Monsanto GMO products, we will not take your cars !!
Gene Watch 21 April 2016: They propose that the EU should waive health and environmental guarantees with regard to (Monsanto) GMO products in order to pave the way for the transatlantic trade agreement. This pressure is now strongly diminishing.

After the leak, governments reject the  TTIP and CETA
After the leak, the French Government (DWN 3 Mai 2016), the two Austrian Presidential candidates (DWN 28. April 2016), the Dutch and the Walloon Parliaments (EurActiv 29 Apr. 2016), have rejected the TTIP / CETA – and even Gabriel, vice Chancellor, rejects them while Super lodges Freemason and National State-hater, Angela Merkel, of course  insists on this NWO betrayal.

DWN 26 April 2016: The TTIP-Gegner der “Global Justice Now” have obtained the publication of the single opinion that the (British) government had ordered on the effect of  the TTIP  under the Freedom of Information Act in the UK, .

 

The London School of Economics (LSE)
In the already 2013 written opinion, the LSE comes to a damning verdict: The TTIP will bring Britain no benefit but substantial risks and can be expected to impose on the British taxpayer  substantial costs.

Comment
This is clearly the realization of the one-world government of the Illuminati. The agreement will transfer all power to this 3-person Court, which is purchased by corporations and their banker -owners.
Curiously, it is the very superglobalistic Greenpeace – which, among others, is funded  by the Rockefeller Foundation and Soros´ Tides – which obstructs the arch-globalists and their companies with this leak.

As I wrote on 7 Jan 2016  with reference to George Soros, The New York Review of Books 27 Sept. 2012: Soros sees the euro and the EU as doomed because Germany did not obey his (and his master´s) Commandment to form a fiscal Union, in which Germany (and wealthy North European EU-states) to pay  the debts of the irresponsible South European States was formed: No European Fiscal Authority to buy the sovereign debts  (bonds) of Greece, Italy, Spain etc. with German money, so that the banksters could not  milk Europe´s prosperous states through draining the irresponsible South European countries. More than Merkel he blames the Deutsche Bundesbank and the German Federal Court.

ADDENDUM

Report by the London School of Economics (LSE) April 2013 

There is little reason to think that an EU-US investment chapter will provide the UK with significant economic benefits

There is little reason to think that an EU-US investment chapter will provide the UK with significant political benefits

In sum, an EU-US investment chapter is likely to provide the UK with few or no benefits.

On the other hand, with more than a quarter of a trillion dollars in US FDI stock, the UK exposes itself to a significant measure of costs. Using Canada’s experience under NAFTA as an example, we would expect those costs to be manageable overall, but nevertheless
considerable.
Unlike in the UK at the time of writing, investment treaty arbitration has
become politically controversial in Canada because of the frequency and character of investor challenges to Canadian government policies, and the Canadian government has had to invest considerable resources in an investment-treaty defence capacity as a result of its more than 30 NAFTA claims. While few of these cases were lost on the merits, Canada has faced incentives
to settle cases either by paying compensation or, in some reported cases, by changing government policies.

We would expect the UK to have an approximately similar experience
under an EU-US investment chapter, though the larger stock of US investment in Britain
could imply that the UK may be subject to an even greater number of disputes – and thus
potential costs – than Canada.

There is little reason to think that an EU-US investment chapter will provide the UK with significant economic benefits

There is little reason to think that an EU-US investment chapter will provide the UK with significant political benefits

In sum, an EU-US investment chapter is likely to provide the UK with few or no benefits.

On the other hand, with more than a quarter of a trillion dollars in US FDI stock, the UK exposes itself to a significant measure of costs. Using Canada’s experience under NAFTA as an example, we would expect those costs to be manageable overall, but nevertheless
considerable.
Unlike in the UK at the time of writing, investment treaty arbitration has
become politically controversial in Canada because of the frequency and character of investor challenges to Canadian government policies, and the Canadian government has had to invest considerable resources in an investment-treaty defence capacity as a result of its more than 30 NAFTA claims. While few of these cases were lost on the merits, Canada has faced incentives
to settle cases either by paying compensation or, in some reported cases, by changing government policies.

We would expect the UK to have an approximately similar experience
under an EU-US investment chapter, though the larger stock of US investment in Britain
could imply that the UK may be subject to an even greater number of disputes – and thus
potential costs – than Canada.

 

This entry was posted in english, euromed. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Super-secretivity on Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Tactically Leaked. Was This the End of the NWO-EU Mega-Treason?

  1. Pingback: Communist / Zionist Transformation of Our World: UN´s Agenda 2030 – aladdinsmiraclelamp

Leave a Reply