ADDENDUM: Press TV 27 Nov. 2015: Dutch Prime Minister. Mark Rutte , whose country gears up to be the next EU president: “The first step is to make sure the border is controlled. As we all know from the Roman Empire, big empires go down if the borders are not well protected.
The Telegraph 27 Nov. 2015 by Alan Sked, the original founder of Ukip and professor of International History at the London School of Economics.
Why would the UK want to enter the EEC?
The answer is that Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of the world in some form of world government based on regional federations.
MacMillan was also a close acquaintance of Jean Monnet, who believed the same. It was therefore Macmillan who became the representative of the European federalist movement in the British cabinet.
In a speech in the House of Commons he even advocated a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) before the real thing had been announced. He later arranged for a Treaty of Association between the UK and the ECSC, and it was he who ensured that a British representative was sent to the Brussels negotiations following the Messina Conference, which gave birth to the EEC.
In the late 1950s he pushed negotiations concerning a European Free Trade Association towards membership of the EEC. Then, when General de Gaulle began to turn the EEC into a less federalist body, he took the risk of submitting a full British membership application in the hope of frustrating Gaullist ambitions.
His aim, in alliance with US and European proponents of a federalist world order, was to frustrate the emerging Franco-German alliance which was seen as one of French and German nationalism.
The French statesman Jean Monnet, (1888 – 1979), who in 1956 was appointed president
of the Action Committee for the United States of Europe (CIA´s ACUE).
Monnet met secretly with Heath and Macmillan on innumerable occasions to facilitate British entry. Indeed, he was informed before the British Parliament of the terms in which the British approach to Europe would be framed.
Despite advice from the Lord Chancellor, Lord Kilmuir, that membership would mean the end of British parliamentary sovereignty, Macmillan deliberately misled the House of Commons — and practically everyone else, from Commonwealth statesmen to cabinet colleagues and the public — that merely minor commercial negotiations were involved. He even tried to deceive de Gaulle that he was an anti-federalist and a close friend who would arrange for France, like Britain, to receive Polaris missiles from the Americans. De Gaulle saw completely through him and vetoed the British bid to enter.
Macmillan left Edward Heath to take matters forward, and Heath, along with Douglas Hurd, arranged — according to the Monnet papers — for the Tory Party to become a (secret) corporate member of Monnet’s Action Committee for a United States of Europe (ACUE).
According to Monnet’s chief aide and biographer, Francois Duchene, both the Labour and Liberal Parties later did the same. Meanwhile the Earl of Gosford, one of Macmillan’s foreign policy ministers in the House of Lords, actually informed the House that the aim of the government’s foreign policy was world government.
Monnet’s (right) Action Committee was also given financial backing by the CIA and the US State Department. The Anglo-American establishment was now committed to the creation of a federal United States of Europe.
Today, this is still the case. Powerful international lobbies are already at work attempting to prove that any return to democratic self-government on the part of Britain will spell doom. American officials have already been primed to state that such a Britain would be excluded from any free trade deal with the USA and that the world needs the TTIP trade treaty which is predicated on the survival of the EU.
Fortunately, Republican candidates in the USA are becoming Eurosceptics and magazines there like The National Interest are publishing the case for Brexit.
Most importantly, having been fooled once, the British public will be much more difficult to fool again.
With Lying, deception and cover-ups, the EU has been built as a region of the One World State. And the deception continues. After the Dutch and French had rejected the EU Constitution in 2005, the EU cheated the Europeans once again with Merkel as leader by the Treaty of Lisbon.
The author of the Constitution was the leading Trilateralist Giscard d’Estaing. In the Danish newspaper Politiken d. 27. okt. 2007, d´Estaing strongly emphasized that the Lisbon Treaty is identical with the constitution – only they had taken out inedible parts and hidden them as simple amendments to the already adopted Maastricht and Nice treaties!! (Le Monde 14 June 2007).
In Denmark it was even more grotesque: Prime Minister Anders Fog Rasmussen had promised the Danes a referendum on the treaty – but broke his promise, as its name changed. For this lie he was received with a standing ovation in the European Council – appointed NATO’s Secretary General and now counselor of the Rothschild Bank Goldman Sachs in the strife over the unfair give-away of the decisive shares of Denmark´s crown jewel, the energy group DONG, to this Rothschild Bank.
The Goal is one-world government – the means is the Euromediterranean Process/Union for the Mediterranean.
In 1992, the Danes rejected the Maastricht Union Treaty in a referendum. To entice the Danes to not scuttle the concept across the EU in a second referendum 1993, the Danes were previously guaranteed 4 opts-out, namely with respect to: 1) Citizenship. 2) The common currency, the euro. 3) The common defense policy. 4) Transnational cooperation on legal and internal matters.
Since then, the Danish Masonic politicians have been like obsessed in their efforts to abolish the 4 opts-out.
Now they have decreed a new referendum for December 3 – this time on the legal opt-out.
But surely there is a legal catch, which the politicians cover up to the people:
As Denmark’s Masonic politicians unconditionally wanted to join the Treaty of Lisbon without a referendum they had a problem: There were 9 in elements in the Lisbon Treaty that were incompatible with the Danish Constitution.
They neutralized those problems in part by coverage by the opts-out – the legal opt-out neutralizing 4 of those unconstitutional elements.
Now they want us to abolish this opt-out on 3 December – which is de facto is unconstitutional and illegal. So the referendum is a vote on the continuing validity of the 166-year-old Danish Constitution – without that being told to the people.
THIS IS THE NWO