Even fanatic EU Climate Commissioner, Connie Hedegaard has publicly admitted that “the science is wrong”. IPCC boss, Rajendra Pachauri has publicly declared “climate science” to be just politically commissioned work – but they carry on to magnify what they obviously know is a giant lie. By the way of the IPCC members, only 20% have had something to do with climate! The IPCC is dominated by politicians, who were willing to prevent the truth from reaching the public in the IPCC AR5 report, e.g. that global temperature has not increased over the past 15 years, and that the Arctic ice increased by 60% in 2013.
However, here a decent climate scientist speaks out, and he has more and more followers among his colleagues.
About Dr. Roy W. Spencer. He received his Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981. Before becoming a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2001, he was a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites. Dr. Spencer’s work with NASA continues as the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He has provided congressional testimony several times on the subject of global warming.
Dr. Spencer’s research has been entirely supported by U.S. government agencies: NASA, NOAA, and DOE. He has never been asked by any oil company to perform any kind of service. Not even Exxon-Mobil.
Dr. Roy W. Spencer´s Blog 20 Febr. 2014
“Yeah, somebody pushed my button.
When politicians and scientists started calling people like me “deniers”, they crossed the line. They are still doing it.
They indirectly equate (1) the skeptics’ view that global warming is not necessarily all manmade nor a serious problem, with (2) the denial that the Nazi’s extermination of millions of Jews ever happened.
Too many of us for too long have ignored the repulsive, extremist nature of the comparison. It’s time to push back.
I’m now going to start calling these people “global warming Nazis”.
The pseudo-scientific ramblings by their leaders have falsely warned of mass starvation, ecological collapse, agricultural collapse, overpopulation…all so that the masses would support their radical policies. Policies that would not voluntarily be supported by a majority of freedom-loving people.
Below: On its way out of a “little ice age” from 1500-1850 after a medieval warm period – which was 2 degrees C warmer than today –global warming has increased by 0.8 degrees C since 1850. This is natural Earth history and has nothing to do with manmade global warming. And nothing at all with the atmospheric CO2 increase from preindustrial 0.027 % to today´s 0,038% – of which only 1% , i.e. 0.00011%, is caused by human activity. The rest comes after and due to the warming from the oceans. So there is much more reason to believe NASA: CO2 protects against global warming!!
They are just as guilty as the person who cries “fire!” in a crowded theater when no fire exists. Except they threaten the lives of millions of people in the process.
Like the Nazis, they advocate the supreme authority of the state (fascism), which in turn supports their scientific research to support their cause (in the 1930s, it was superiority of the white race).
Dissenting scientific views are now jack-booted through tactics like pressuring scientific journals to not publish papers with which they disagree…even getting journal editors to resign.
Like the Nazis, they are anti-capitalist. They are willing to sacrifice millions of lives of poor people at the altar of radical environmentalism, advocating expensive energy policies that increase poverty. And if there is a historically demonstrable threat to humanity, it is poverty.
4 News 4 Sept. 2014 The University of Leeds researchers found that in the UK, one in 10 was eating half the calories recommended for their age – 3.5 per cent missed at least one meal a day.
Take one child’s entry:
“A glass of water for breakfast, a piece of cake later in the day. A ham sandwich provides the main meal, crisps, chocolate biscuits and a bowl of ice cream the extras.”
This child won’t starve to death. There’ll be no dramatic pictures to invoke sympathy or even intervention. However, at 780 calories for the day, this child is not even getting half of the calories they need to grow healthily.
Statistic Brain: in 2013, – 7.6 Mio. died from starvation.
Acc. to The Guardian, 850 mio. people go hungry to bed every night. Acc. to Vision of the Earth 2011 it would cost 175bn dollars to eradicate worldwide poverty! So the scandalous spending of the sums given below is tantamount to mass murder.
I’m not talking about those who think we should be working toward new forms of energy to eventually displace our dependence of fossil fuels. Even I believe in that; after all, fossil fuels are a finite resource.
I’m instead talking about the extremists. They are the ones who are sure they are right, and who are bent on forcing their views upon everyone else. Unfortunately, the extremists are usually the only ones you hear from in the media, because they scream the loudest and make the most outrageous claims.
Would you believe in this AlGore-ithm which first preached the global warming madness? His “Inconvenient Truth” turned out to contain at least 9 inconvenient lies in a British court – and 35 acc. to Lord Christopher Monckton. Nor did his Nobel Prize acceptamce prediction 2007 that the Arctic Sea would be ice free in 2014 come true (Daily Arctic Sea Ice Map above right).
What about his villa that consumes 20 times more energy than than a normal house?
Where did he have his mendacious concept from? From the man who invented the made CO2 global warming scam, Edmund de Rothschild. Hear him in 1987 at the 4. Wilderness Congress on this video below from the 28:45 mark. He launches an idea of capturing CO2 and sail it to the poles and Sahara to lower temperatures there – just as climatists are giving their imaginations a free rein to do (capture and store) today.
They invoke “consensus”, which results from only like-minded scientists who band together to support a common cause.
This authoritarianism tends to happen with an over-educated elite class…I have read that Nazi Germany had more PhDs per capita than any other country. I’m not against education, but it seems like some of the stupidest people are also the most educated.
So, as long as they continue to call people like me “deniers”, I will call them “global warming Nazis”. I didn’t start this fight…they did. Yeah, somebody pushed my button.
NOTE: A couple people in comments have questioned my use of “Nazi”, which might be considered over the top. Considering the fact that these people are supporting policies that will kill far more people than the Nazis ever did — all in the name of what they consider to be a righteous cause — I think it is very appropriate. Again, I didn’t start the name-calling.”
Thank you, Mr. Spencer. You hit the nail on the head.
I have seen some of the comments – and they are hard on Dr. Spencer: For he has shaken their NWO religion.
Björn Lomborg 29 Nov. 2013 Project Syndicate: “Over the course of this century, the ideal EU policy would cost more than $7 trillion, yet it would reduce the temperature rise by just 0.05o Celsius and lower sea levels by a trivial 9 millimeters. After spending all that money, we would not even be able to tell the difference.”
Reuters 22 Oct. 2013: Global spending to combat climate change fell last year and remains far below the level needed to prevent its most dangerous effects, a report by the Climate Policy Initiative said on Tuesday.
Investment in renewable energy, energy efficiency and adaptation to climate change totalled $359 billion, $5 billion less than in 2011.
The International Energy Agency estimated last year that $5 trillion of investment in clean energy alone was needed by 2020 to keep a rise in global temperatures to within 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit).
The increasing habit of the fanatic NWO stooges to retract peer-reviewed already published scientific work when it reveals the unpolitical truth was seen in the case of Prof. Seralini´s study of rats developing disgusting tumors as well as liver and kidney damages on Monsanto corn diet – left.
The IPCC “science” is perfomed by mostly amateur NWO whores giving their services to the highest bidder – although they must know their statements are false.
For they know very well the dry facts presented to them and us by NASA, NOAA, University Alabama Huntsville, CRU Hadley – nicely compiled by Prof. Ole Humlum, Oslo Even the arch scoundrel of the Climategate and here scandal, Prof Philip Jones, has stated that there has been no global warming since 1995. In Jyllands-Posten 16 Sept. 2013, renowned warmist? Björn Lomborg even tells the IPCC has exaggerated global temperature increase by 300 percent!
But this biggest lie in human history will be greatly amplified much to the suffering and dying of mankind, because it not only consumes so immense sums which should be spent on combating poverty and hunger where possible – but it will also increase this suffering worldwide. But global warming is the central supporting pillar of the satanic NWO.